Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 6;12(2):e70258.
doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70258. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Tibial tubercle torsion is associated with patellar height when measured by computed tomography

Affiliations

Tibial tubercle torsion is associated with patellar height when measured by computed tomography

Joseph D Giusto et al. J Exp Orthop. .

Abstract

Purpose: To establish an average tibial tubercle (TT) torsion angle from computed tomography (CT) scans of patients without known patellofemoral instability and investigate whether TT torsion angles would differ based on demographics, tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance and patellar height.

Methods: The Stryker Orthopaedics Modeling and Analytics (SOMA) database was queried for patients with CT scans and available measures related to patella and TT position. The mean TT torsion angle was compared in patients with an increased and normal TT-TG distance (≥20 vs. <20 mm) and patellar height (Insall-Salvati [IS] index ≥1.3 vs. <1.3). Measurements of sulcus angle, patellar inclination angle, congruence angle, trochlear groove depth and long limb axis alignment were assessed.

Results: A total of 886 knees from 499 patients within the SOMA database were included, with a mean age of 59.4 ± 16.5 years and 238 (48%) females. The mean TT torsion angle for all patients was 24.7 ± 5.2°. Females had a significantly higher mean IS index (1.24 vs. 1.18), TT-TG distance (13.8 mm vs. 11.8 mm) and TT torsion angle (25.5° vs. 24.0°) compared to males. The mean TT torsion angle for patients with a TT-TG distance ≥20 mm and <20 mm was 24.7° in both groups (p = n.s.). There was a significantly greater TT torsion angle in patients with an IS index ≥1.3 (26.6°) compared to those with an IS index <1.3 (24.0°) (p < 0.001). A weak and positive correlation was found between TT torsion angle and IS index (r = 0.242, p < 0.001), but not with other measurements.

Conclusion: The mean TT torsion angle for patients without known patellofemoral instability was 24.7° and increased TT torsion angles were associated with increased patellar height. An association between TT torsion and TT-TG was not found. Findings of the current study describe the relationship between morphologic assessments of the patellofemoral joint using CT.

Level of evidence: Level IV, cohort study.

Keywords: CT; Insall‐Salvati index; TTTG; patellar height; patellar instability; tibial tubercle torsion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Matthieu Ollivier is a Newclip educational consultant and receives royalties from Stryker. Sally LiArno and Faizan Ahmad are employees of Stryker. The remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Calculation of the tibial tubercle (TT) torsion angle. (a) A patient image is used to manually calculate TT torsion using an axial computed tomography (CT) slice. (1) The cut in which the posterior femoral condyles are best visualized is used to create the posterior femoral condylar axis. (2) To determine the TT axis, a line is drawn through the intersection of two points marking the medial and lateral borders of the tibial tubercle. (θ) The TT torsion angle is then calculated on the medial side of the two axes. (b) Example of TT torsion calculation using three‐dimensional bone modelling of CT scans from SOMA automated software (24.2°).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Demographic comparisons of radiographic measurements. (a) Sex: male (n = 463), female (n = 423). (b) Age in years: <18 (n = 8), 18–39 (n = 103), 40–64 (n = 371) and ≥65 (n = 367). *Significantly higher value detected compared to males (p < 0.05). CT, computed tomography; IS, Insall‐Salvati; TT, tibial tubercle; TT‐TG, tibial tubercle‐trochlear groove. Measurements described for all included CT scans (not individual patients).

Similar articles

References

    1. Ackermann J, Hasler J, Graf DN, Fucentese SF, Vlachopoulos L. The effect of native knee rotation on the tibial‐tubercle‐trochlear‐groove distance in patients with patellar instability: an analysis of MRI and CT measurements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022;142:3149–3155. - PubMed
    1. Bremond N, Prima R, Rabattu PY, Accadbled F, Chotel F, Konkel M, et al. Isolated MPFL reconstruction with soft tissue femoral fixation technique in 54 skeletally immature patients: clinical outcomes at 2 years follow‐up. A French multicenter retrospective study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2023;109:103530. - PubMed
    1. Camp CL, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ, Levy BA, Bond JR, Collins MS, et al. CT and MRI measurements of tibial tubercle‐trochlear groove distances are not equivalent in patients with patellar instability. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:1835–1840. - PubMed
    1. Chassaing V, Zeitoun JM, Camara M, Blin JL, Marque S, Chancelier MD. Tibial tubercle torsion, a new factor of patellar instability. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103:1173–1178. - PubMed
    1. Chassaing V, Vendeuvre T, Blin JL, Decrette E, Zeitoun JM, Courilleau N, et al. How tibial tubercle torsion impacts patellar stability: a biomechanics study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020;106:495–501. - PubMed