Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;68(8):941-950.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003790. Epub 2025 May 7.

International Consensus on Reporting Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The CoReAL Reporting Framework

Collaborators, Affiliations

International Consensus on Reporting Anastomotic Leaks After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: The CoReAL Reporting Framework

Danique J I Heuvelings et al. Dis Colon Rectum. .

Abstract

Background: Anastomotic leak frequently complicates colorectal anastomoses with high morbidity and mortality. The substantial variability in published leak rates reflects the lack of consistency in reporting variables that may impact the occurrence, management, and short- and long-term outcomes of patients.

Objective: The Consensus for Reporting of Colorectal Anastomotic Leaks is an international collaborative that developed a standardized evidence-based framework for reporting key variables related to the entire episode of colorectal anastomotic leak in patients with cancer.

Design: Along the preoperative, intraoperative, and short- and long-term postoperative phases of a left-sided colorectal anastomotic leak, key questions regarding all potentially relevant variables were formulated. A literature review was conducted to generate evidence-based statements in response to these questions. Statements that reached consensus, together with input from patients' experience and experts' opinion, were incorporated into the framework as reporting elements.

Setting: Modified Delphi methodology, including online voting and an in-person consensus meeting, was used to generate consensus statements based on the literature review and to develop the reporting framework.

Participants: An international panel of 32 colorectal surgeons with expertise in the field of colorectal anastomotic leaks, representing 6 surgical societies, along with radiologists, research collaborators, patients, health care economists, and surgical trial methodologists.

Main outcome measures: Evidence-based statements and reporting elements with more than 70% agreement were included.

Results: Consensus among experts was achieved on 33 evidence-based statements and 43 reporting elements for the Consensus on Reporting colorectal Anastomotic Leaks framework. The reporting elements encompassed evidence-based statements (27), patient perspectives (7), and expert opinion (9).

Limitations: Sampling did not represent all regions in the world. Because of the paucity of evidence for some topics, evidence-based statements were primarily based on a moderate-to-low level of evidence.

Conclusions: This international consensus provides an evidence-based standardized framework for reporting of key variables related to a colorectal anastomotic leak after oncologic resection. See Video Abstract .

Consenso internacional sobre la notificacin de fugas anastomticas tras la ciruga de cncer colorrectal el marco de notificacin coreal: ANTECEDENTES:La fuga anastomótica complica frecuentemente las anastomosis colorrectales, con alta morbilidad y mortalidad. La considerable variabilidad en las tasas de fugas publicadas refleja la falta de consistencia en el reporte de variables que pueden afectar en los pacientes, tanto la incidencia y el manejo como los resultados a corto y largo plazo.OBJETIVO:El Consenso para el Reporte de Fugas Anastomóticas Colorrectales (CoReAL) es el resultado de una colaboración internacional que desarrolló un marco estandarizado basado en la evidencia para evaluar las variables clave relacionadas con el episodio de fuga anastomótica colorrectal en pacientes con cáncer.DISEÑO:Durante las fases preoperatoria, intraoperatoria y postoperatoria a corto y largo plazo en casos de fuga anastomótica colorrectal izquierda, se formularon preguntas clave sobre todas las variables potencialmente relevantes. Se realizó una revisión bibliográfica para generar declaraciones basadas en la evidencia como respuesta a estas preguntas. Las declaraciones consensuadas, junto con la experiencia de los pacientes y la opinión de expertos, se incorporaron al marco como elementos de reporte.CONTEXTO:Se utilizó la metodología Delphi modificada, que incluyó votación en línea y una reunión de consenso presencial, para generar declaraciones de consenso basadas en la revisión bibliográfica y desarrollar el marco de presentación de informes.PARTICIPANTES:Panel internacional que incluyó 32 cirujanos colorrectales con experiencia en el campo de las fugas anastomóticas colorrectales, cirujanos representantes de 6 sociedades quirúrgicas, junto con radiólogos, colaboradores de investigación, pacientes, economistas de la salud y metodólogos de estudios quirúrgicos.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron las declaraciones basadas en la evidencia y los elementos de informes con más del 70% de acuerdo.RESULTADOS:Se logró consenso entre los expertos sobre 33 declaraciones basadas en la evidencia y 43 elementos de presentación de informes para el marco CoReAL. Los elementos con la presentación de informes abarcaron declaraciones basadas en la evidencia (27), perspectivas de los pacientes (7) y la opinión de expertos (9).LIMITACIONES:El muestreo no representó a todas las regiones del mundo. Debido a la escasez de evidencia en algunos temas, las declaraciones basadas en la evidencia se basaron principalmente en un nivel de evidencia moderado a bajo.CONCLUSIONES:El presente consenso internacional proporciona un marco estandarizado basado en la evidencia para informar las variables clave relacionadas con la fuga anastomótica colorrectal después de una resección oncológica. (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage; Colorectal surgery; Consensus; Patient outcomes; Reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Work process and methodology of the CoReAL framework. AL = anastomotic leak; CoReAL = Consensus on Reporting colorectal Anastomotic Leaks project; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation.

References

    1. McArdle CS, McMillan DC, Hole DJ. Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;92:1150–1154. - PubMed
    1. Branagan G, Finnis D; Wessex Colorectal Cancer Audit Working Group. Prognosis after anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:1021–1026. - PubMed
    1. Kube R, Mroczkowski P, Granowski D, et al. ; Study group Qualitätssicherung Kolon/Rektum-Karzinome (Primärtumor) (Quality assurance in primary colorectal carcinoma). Anastomotic leakage after colon cancer surgery: a predictor of significant morbidity and hospital mortality, and diminished tumour-free survival. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2010;36:120–124. - PubMed
    1. Bakker IS, Grossmann I, Henneman D, Havenga K, Wiggers T. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage and leak-related mortality after colonic cancer surgery in a nationwide audit. Br J Surg. 2014;101:424–432. - PubMed
    1. Kulu Y, Tarantio I, Warschkow R, et al. Anastomotic leakage is associated with impaired overall and disease-free survival after curative rectal cancer resection: a propensity score analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:2059–2067. - PubMed

Publication types