Medically Actionable Secondary Findings from Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Data in a Sample of 3972 Individuals
- PMID: 40332002
- PMCID: PMC12027037
- DOI: 10.3390/ijms26083509
Medically Actionable Secondary Findings from Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) Data in a Sample of 3972 Individuals
Abstract
The application of whole-exome sequencing (WES) for diagnostic purposes has the potential to unravel secondary findings unrelated with the primary reason of testing. Some of those might be of high clinical utility and comprise disease-causing variants in genes, related to life-threatening and clinically actionable diseases. Clarifying the allelic frequencies of such variants in specific populations is a crucial step for the large-scale deployment of genomic medicine. We analysed medically relevant variants in the 81 genes from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) v3.2 list of actionable loci, using WES data from a diagnostic laboratory cohort of 3972 persons, tentatively resampled to represent the Portuguese population geographic distribution. We identified medically actionable variants in 6.2% of our cohort, distributed across several disease domains: cardiovascular disorders (3.0%), cancer predisposition (2.0%), miscellaneous disorders (1.1%), and metabolic disorders (0.1%). Additionally, we estimated a frequency of heterozygotes for recessive disease alleles of 11.1%. Overall, our results suggest that medically actionable findings can be identified in approximately 6.2% of persons from our population. This is the first study estimating medically actionable findings in Portugal. These results provide valuable insight for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers involved in advancing genomic medicine at the national and international level.
Keywords: actionable secondary findings; genomic medicine; whole-exome sequencing.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Green R.C., Berg J.S., Grody W.W., Kalia S.S., Korf B.R., Martin C.L., McGuire A.L., Nussbaum R.L., O’Daniel J.M., Ormond K.E., et al. ACMG Recommendations for Reporting of Incidental Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing. Genet. Med. 2013;15:565–574. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.73. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kalia S.S., Adelman K., Bale S.J., Chung W.K., Eng C., Evans J.P., Herman G.E., Hufnagel S.B., Klein T.E., Korf B.R., et al. Recommendations for Reporting of Secondary Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing, 2016 Update (ACMG SF v2.0): A Policy Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet. Med. 2017;19:249–255. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.190. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Miller D.T., Lee K., Gordon A.S., Amendola L.M., Adelman K., Bale S.J., Chung W.K., Gollob M.H., Harrison S.M., Herman G.E., et al. Recommendations for Reporting of Secondary Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing, 2021 Update: A Policy Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Genet. Med. 2021;23:1391–1398. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01171-4. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Miller D.T., Lee K., Chung W.K., Gordon A.S., Herman G.E., Klein T.E., Stewart D.R., Amendola L.M., Adelman K., Bale S.J., et al. ACMG SF v3.0 List for Reporting of Secondary Findings in Clinical Exome and Genome Sequencing: A Policy Statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) Genet. Med. 2021;23:1381–1390. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01172-3. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources