Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 19;26(8):3868.
doi: 10.3390/ijms26083868.

The Relationship Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Markers and Response to Biological Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis

Affiliations

The Relationship Between Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio, and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Markers and Response to Biological Therapy in Patients with Psoriasis

Agnieszka Kimak-Pielas et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

Plaque psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease characterized by the formation of thick, scaly plaques. The disease is driven by dysregulation of the immune response, primarily involving T-helper cells, which create a persistent inflammatory environment. In recent years, several biomarkers reflecting systemic inflammation have been identified, including indices derived from a complete blood count, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index (SII). The aim of our study was to explore the role of these markers in patients with psoriasis undergoing biological treatment. Medical records of 159 patients with plaque psoriasis receiving biologics were retrospectively reviewed. The NLR, PLR, and SII values were calculated from the hemograms of the patients. Additionally, demographic and psoriasis severity data were analyzed. During the 18-month follow-up, the mean NLR, PLR, SII, and CRP values were significantly decreased in comparison to the baseline (p < 0.05). No significant differences between anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, anti-IL-17, and anti-IL-23 drugs were identified (p > 0.05). The initial values of NLR, PLR, and SII were positively correlated with psoriasis severity. No relationship between the analyzed biomarkers and age, sex, psoriasis duration, and prior exposure to biological drugs was identified. CBC-derived biomarkers may be useful for monitoring inflammation reduction in psoriasis patients treated with biological drugs.

Keywords: biological therapy; neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; psoriasis; systemic immune-inflammation index.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
NLR, PLR, SII, and CRP reduction in the patients treated with biological drugs. The reduction between timepoints 0 and 5 was statistically significant, whereas the decrease between timepoints 1 and 5 did not reach statistical significance. (A) NLR 0–5 p = 0.00335, NLR 1–5 p = 0.65496, (B) PLR 0–5 p = 0.00270, PLR 1–5 p = 0.38538, (C) SII 0–5 p = 0.00001, SII 1–5 p = 0.19407, (D) CRP 0–5 p = 0.00010, CRP 1–5 p = 0.70954 (ANOVA).
Figure 1
Figure 1
NLR, PLR, SII, and CRP reduction in the patients treated with biological drugs. The reduction between timepoints 0 and 5 was statistically significant, whereas the decrease between timepoints 1 and 5 did not reach statistical significance. (A) NLR 0–5 p = 0.00335, NLR 1–5 p = 0.65496, (B) PLR 0–5 p = 0.00270, PLR 1–5 p = 0.38538, (C) SII 0–5 p = 0.00001, SII 1–5 p = 0.19407, (D) CRP 0–5 p = 0.00010, CRP 1–5 p = 0.70954 (ANOVA).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Correlation between NLR, PLR, SII, and CRP and BSA (A) and PASI (B). Dashed lines represent the 95% confidence interval (CI95).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Canonical analysis of correlations between NLR, PLR, and SII changes. (A) NLR vs. PLR, (B) NLR vs. SII, (C) PLR vs. SII.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Study design.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Yamazaki F. Psoriasis: Comorbidities. J. Dermatol. 2021;48:732. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.15840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rendon A., Schäkel K. Psoriasis Pathogenesis and Treatment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:1475. doi: 10.3390/ijms20061475. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Reich A., Szepietowski J., Adamski Z., Chodorowska G., Kaszuba A., Krasowska D., Lesiak A., Maj J., Narbutt J., Osmola-Mankowska A., et al. Psoriasis. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Recommendations of the Polish Dermatological Society. Part II: Moderate to Severe Psoriasis. Dermatol. Rev. Przegląd Dermatol. 2018;105:329–357. doi: 10.5114/dr.2020.95259. - DOI
    1. Kimak-Pielas A., Robak E., Zajdel R., Zebrowska A. Demographics, Disease Characteristics, and Treatment Patterns of Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Biological Drugs: The Experience of a Single-Centre Study in Poland. J. Clin. Med. 2024;13:7647. doi: 10.3390/jcm13247647. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Liu Y.C., Chuang S.H., Chen Y.P., Shih Y.H. Associations of Novel Complete Blood Count-Derived Inflammatory Markers with Psoriasis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2024;316:228. doi: 10.1007/s00403-024-02994-2. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms