Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2025 Jul 1;82(7):663-670.
doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0666.

Reporting and Representation of Race and Ethnicity in Clinical Trials of Pharmacotherapy for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Reporting and Representation of Race and Ethnicity in Clinical Trials of Pharmacotherapy for Mental Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Alessio Bellato et al. JAMA Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Importance: Representation of race and ethnicity in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) is critical for understanding treatment efficacy across populations with different racial and ethnic backgrounds.

Objective: To examine race and ethnicity representation and reporting across RCTs of pharmacotherapies for mental disorders.

Data sources: PubMed (Medline), Embase (Ovid), APA PsycInfo, and Web of Science were searched until March 1, 2024, to retrieve network meta-analyses including RCTs of pharmacotherapies for International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision mental disorders.

Study selection: RCTs that recruited people of any age with a diagnosis of a mental disorder and that tested the efficacy of any pharmacologic intervention vs any control arm.

Data extraction and synthesis: Random-effects logit-transformed proportion meta-analyses were used to estimate prevalence rates of race and ethnicity groups and their temporal trends across RCTs and to compare US RCT prevalence rates with US Census data. The Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews was used to report our review.

Main outcomes and measures: Reporting of data and percentages of race and ethnicity. The year of publication, type of RCT, geographic location, age group, and sample size were also included. There were no deviations that occurred from the original protocol.

Results: Data were obtained from 1683 RCTs (375 120 participants in total). Of these, 1363 (91.7% of participants) included participants aged 18 years or older; 680 RCTs (36.0% of participants) were from the US, 404 (17.1% of participants) were from Europe, and 293 (29.9% of participants) were from multiple geographic locations. Race and ethnicity were reported in 39.2% of RCTs; reporting was the highest in US-based RCTs (58.7%) and lowest in Central and South America (8.7%) and Asia and the Middle East (12.4%). Among participants, 2.7% (95% CI, 2.1%-3.5%) self-reported as Asian, 9.0% (95% CI, 8.1%-10.0%) as Black, 11.0% (95% CI, 9.1%-13.3%) as Hispanic among White, 80.2% (95% CI, 78.8%-81.5%) as White including Hispanic, and 5.8% (95% CI, 5.2%-6.4%) as other race or ethnicity, multiracial, or multiethnic. There was more frequent reporting of race and ethnicity in US RCTs (log odds increased by 0.066 each year) and less frequent reporting in non-US RCTs (log odds increased by 0.023 each year). Studies reporting race and ethnicity did not generally include larger sample sizes (mean sample size, 263.7 [95% CI, 15.0-860.3] participants) compared with those not reporting such data (mean sample size, 196.6 [95% CI, 12.0-601.3] participants), albeit not in all locations. In US RCTs, adults in the other or multiracial and multiethnic category were historically overrepresented, while adults in Asian, Black, Hispanic among White, and White including Hispanic categories were underrepresented; Asian, Black, and Hispanic among White children and adolescents are still currently underrepresented.

Conclusions and relevance: The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that differences in reporting race and ethnicity across geographic locations and underrepresentation of certain racial and ethnic groups in US-based RCTs highlight the need for international guidelines to ensure equitable recruitment and reporting in clinical trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Bellato reported receiving honorarium as joint editor of Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry Advances from The Association for Child and Adolescent Mental Health (ACAMH) outside the submitted work. Dr. Raduà reported receiving continuing medical education honoraria from Inspira Networks for a machine learning course promoted by Adamed outside the submitted work. Prof Correll reported receiving royalties from UpToDate outside the submitted work and reported being a consultant for and/or advisor to or receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Alkermes, Allergan, Angelini, Aristo, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardio Diagnostics, Cerevel, CNX Therapeutics, Compass Pathways, Darnitsa, Delpor, Denovo, Eli Lilly, Gedeon Richter, Hikma, Holmusk, IntraCellular Therapies, Jamjoom Pharma, Janssen/J&J, Karuna, LB Pharma, Lundbeck, MedInCell, MedLink, Merck, Mindpax, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Maplight, Mylan, Neumora Therapeutics, Neurocrine, Neurelis, Newron, Noven, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, PPD Biotech, Recordati, Relmada, Reviva, Rovi, Saladax, Sanofi, Seqirus, Servier, Sumitomo Pharma America, Sunovion, Sun Pharma, Supernus, Tabuk, Takeda, Teva, Terran, Tolmar, Vertex, Viatris, and Xenon Pharmaceuticals; providing expert testimony for Janssen, Lundbeck, and Otsuka; serving on a Data Safety Monitoring Board for Compass Pathways, IntraCellular Therapies, Relmada, Reviva, and Rovi; receiving grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, and Takeda; and having stock options in Cardio Diagnostics, Kuleon Biosciences, LB Pharma, Medlink, Mindpax, Quantic, and Terran. Prof Fusar-Poli reported receiving grants from Lundbeck and honoraria from Angelini, Menarini, and Lundbeck outside the submitted work. Dr Solmi reported receiving honoraria for serving on the advisory board, for presentations, and for being a consultant for AbbVie, Angelini, Lundbeck, and Otsuka outside the submitted work. Prof Cortese reported receiving personal fees from ACAMH, the British Association for Psychopharmacology, the Canadian Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Resource Alliance, and Medice outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Similar articles

References

    1. Geneviève LD, Martani A, Shaw D, Elger BS, Wangmo T. Structural racism in precision medicine: leaving no one behind. BMC Med Ethics. 2020;21(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-0457-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shanawani H, Dame L, Schwartz DA, Cook-Deegan R. Non-reporting and inconsistent reporting of race and ethnicity in articles that claim associations among genotype, outcome, and race or ethnicity. J Med Ethics. 2006;32(12):724-728. doi: 10.1136/jme.2005.014456 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Solmi M, Cortese S, Vita G, et al. An umbrella review of candidate predictors of response, remission, recovery, and relapse across mental disorders. Mol Psychiatry. 2023;28(9):3671-3687. doi: 10.1038/s41380-023-02298-3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xavier RM, Shanavas Y, Britt BM, George WT. Influences of race and clinical variables on psychiatric genetic research participation: results from a schizophrenia sample. PLoS One. 2023;18(4):e0284356. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284356 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Duello TM, Rivedal S, Wickland C, Weller A. Race and genetics versus “race” in genetics: a systematic review of the use of African ancestry in genetic studies. Evol Med Public Health. 2021;9(1):232-245. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoab018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms