Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Apr 13;18(8):1771.
doi: 10.3390/ma18081771.

Application of Machine Learning in Amorphous Alloys

Affiliations
Review

Application of Machine Learning in Amorphous Alloys

Like Zhang et al. Materials (Basel). .

Abstract

In the past few decades, traditional methods for developing amorphous alloys, such as empirical trial-and-error approaches and density functional theory (DFT)-based calculations, have enabled researchers to explore numerous amorphous alloy systems and investigate their properties. However, these methods are increasingly unable to meet the demands of modern research due to their long development cycles and low efficiency. In contrast, machine learning (ML) has gained widespread adoption in the design, analysis, and property prediction of amorphous alloys due to its advantages of low experimental cost, powerful performance, and short development cycles. This review focuses on four key applications of ML in amorphous alloys: (1) prediction of amorphous alloy phases, (2) prediction of amorphous composite phases, (3) prediction of glass-forming ability (GFA), and (4) prediction of material properties. Finally, we outline future directions for ML in materials science, including the development of more sophisticated models, integration with high-throughput experimentation, and the creation of standardized data-sharing platforms. These insights provide potential research directions and frameworks for subsequent studies in this field.

Keywords: amorphous alloys; glass-forming ability; machine learning; properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of published works on “machine learning” and “machine learning” + “material” (from January 1999 to September 2018) [7]. Copyright © 2019, Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The relationship between the experimental Young’s modulus and the predicted values of the optimal model: (a) XGBoost; (b) RF; (c) SVR [90]. Copyright © 2020, Springer Nature.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Inoue A. Stabilization of metallic supercooled liquid and bulk amorphous alloys. Acta Mater. 2000;48:279–306. doi: 10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00300-6. - DOI
    1. Blyskun P., Maj P., Kowalczyk M., Latuch J., Kulik T. Relation of various GFA indicators to the critical diameter of Zr-based BMGs. J. Alloys Compd. 2015;625:13–17. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.11.112. - DOI
    1. Qiao J., Jia H., Liaw P.K. Metallic glass matrix composites. Mater. Sci. Eng. R-Rep. 2016;100:1–69. doi: 10.1016/j.mser.2015.12.001. - DOI
    1. Samuel A.L. Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J. Res. Dev. 1959;3:210. doi: 10.1147/rd.33.0210. - DOI
    1. Ramprasad R., Batra R., Pilania G., Mannodi-Kanakkithodi A., Kim C. Machine learning in materials informatics: Recent applications and prospects. Npj Comput. Mater. 2017;3:54. doi: 10.1038/s41524-017-0056-5. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources