Can impersonal touch replace interpersonal touch? An investigation using the rubber hand illusion
- PMID: 40334218
- PMCID: PMC12058145
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319433
Can impersonal touch replace interpersonal touch? An investigation using the rubber hand illusion
Abstract
Our socio-emotional development and well-being critically depends on interpersonal tactile interactions, which are sensed by the skin through C-tactile (CT) afferents that respond to gentle, slow touch at typical skin temperatures. In the present study, we investigated whether impersonal touch would be able to provide similar pleasantness compared to interpersonal touch within a body-ownership illusion paradigm. To provide impersonal touch at similar parameters, we used a thermal probe kept at [Formula: see text]C (typical skin-to-skin temperature) compared to a flat hand as interpersonal touch. Both forms of touch were performed at CT-compatible speeds of 3cm/s by a male trained experimenter within a classic rubber hand illusion (RHI) paradigm in two counter-balanced within-participant conditions. A sample of N=45 healthy participants was tested and pleasantness ratings, touch deprivation, and the Need-For-Touch-Scale (NFT) were gathered. Overall, the illusion was similar in both touch conditions and, importantly, we found no statistically significant difference in pleasantness between interpersonal and impersonal touch. Interestingly, neither NFT scores, nor touch deprivation measures correlated with individual differences in the RHI and affective ratings. Our results suggest that impersonal touch with CT-optimal components provide a pleasantness and subjective illusion experience compared to interpersonal touch under the RHI paradigm.
Copyright: © 2025 Bae. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Affective touch modulates the rubber hand illusion.Cognition. 2014 Apr;131(1):147-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.11.020. Epub 2014 Feb 1. Cognition. 2014. PMID: 24487106
-
No consistent cooling of the real hand in the rubber hand illusion.Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Sep;179:68-77. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.07.003. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017. PMID: 28735225
-
Explaining away the body: experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion.PLoS One. 2010 Feb 24;5(2):e9416. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009416. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20195378 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Relationship between sensitivity to visuotactile temporal discrepancy and the rubber hand illusion.Neurosci Res. 2014 Aug;85:33-8. doi: 10.1016/j.neures.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 26. Neurosci Res. 2014. PMID: 24874005
-
The rubber hand universe: On the impact of methodological differences in the rubber hand illusion.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Sep;104:268-280. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.07.008. Epub 2019 Jul 20. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019. PMID: 31336114 Review.
References
-
- Mountcastle VB. The sensory hand: neural mechanisms of somatic sensation. Harvard University Press; 2005.
-
- Auvray M, Duriez C. Haptics: neuroscience, devices, modeling, applications. In: 9th International Conference and EuroHaptics 2014, Versailles, France, June 24–26, 2014, Proceedings, Part I. Springer; 2014.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical