Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 7;20(5):e0319433.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319433. eCollection 2025.

Can impersonal touch replace interpersonal touch? An investigation using the rubber hand illusion

Affiliations

Can impersonal touch replace interpersonal touch? An investigation using the rubber hand illusion

Jaehyoung Bae et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Our socio-emotional development and well-being critically depends on interpersonal tactile interactions, which are sensed by the skin through C-tactile (CT) afferents that respond to gentle, slow touch at typical skin temperatures. In the present study, we investigated whether impersonal touch would be able to provide similar pleasantness compared to interpersonal touch within a body-ownership illusion paradigm. To provide impersonal touch at similar parameters, we used a thermal probe kept at [Formula: see text]C (typical skin-to-skin temperature) compared to a flat hand as interpersonal touch. Both forms of touch were performed at CT-compatible speeds of 3cm/s by a male trained experimenter within a classic rubber hand illusion (RHI) paradigm in two counter-balanced within-participant conditions. A sample of N=45 healthy participants was tested and pleasantness ratings, touch deprivation, and the Need-For-Touch-Scale (NFT) were gathered. Overall, the illusion was similar in both touch conditions and, importantly, we found no statistically significant difference in pleasantness between interpersonal and impersonal touch. Interestingly, neither NFT scores, nor touch deprivation measures correlated with individual differences in the RHI and affective ratings. Our results suggest that impersonal touch with CT-optimal components provide a pleasantness and subjective illusion experience compared to interpersonal touch under the RHI paradigm.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental setup.
(a) The thermal probe. (b) The real and fake hands.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Correlation between interpersonal and impersonal touch.
(a) Degree of RHI between the touch conditions, Pearson r = .707, p < .001, 95% CI[–0.41, 0.41]. (b) Degree of pleasantness between the touch conditions, Pearson r = .341, p = .022, 95% CI[–0.36, 0.58].
Fig 3
Fig 3. Heatmap of Pearson correlation coefficient matrix.
The correlation coefficient matrix is color coded from white (0) to black ±1. Red boxes indicate significant correlations surviving the target FDR level α=0.05.

Similar articles

References

    1. Mountcastle VB. The sensory hand: neural mechanisms of somatic sensation. Harvard University Press; 2005.
    1. Cascio CJ, Moore D, McGlone F. Social touch and human development. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2019;35:5–11. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.009 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellingsen DM, Leknes S, Løseth G, Wessberg J, Olausson H. The neurobiology shaping affective touch: expectation, motivation and meaning in the multisensory context. Front Psychol. 2016;6:1986. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01986 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGlone F, Wessberg J, Olausson H. Discriminative, affective touch: sensing and feeling. Neuron. 2014;82(4):737–55. doi: 10.1016/jn.neuron.2014.05.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Auvray M, Duriez C. Haptics: neuroscience, devices, modeling, applications. In: 9th International Conference and EuroHaptics 2014, Versailles, France, June 24–26, 2014, Proceedings, Part I. Springer; 2014.