Comparison of mid-turbinate nasal and combined nasal-throat specimen types for detection of respiratory viruses in children
- PMID: 40334554
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2025.105801
Comparison of mid-turbinate nasal and combined nasal-throat specimen types for detection of respiratory viruses in children
Abstract
Background: The source of respiratory specimens may impact the detection of respiratory viruses. It may also have implications for research participant recruitment, caregiver acceptability due to concerns for patient comfort, and potential risk of aerosolization during epidemics/pandemics.
Objective: To determine the impact of collecting a throat swab (TS) in addition to a mid-turbinate nasal swab (MTS) by comparing agreement of viral detection and relative viral loads.
Study design: We reviewed molecular detection results from 2548 children enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network at Seattle Children's Hospital from 11/2015-05/2019. Participants with a clinical MTS who agreed to collection of a combined TS and MTS (TS&MTS) for research were included. All specimens were tested using FilmArrayR Respiratory Panel (Biofire Diagnostics). Viral detection from MTS and TS&MTS were compared. Relative viral loads were compared between specimens with concordant (same viruses detected) and discordant (different or additional viruses detected) results.
Results: Results from 743 participants with clinical MTS and research TS&MTS specimens were compared; Viral detections were similar between the two groups, including 596 (80.2 %) paired results that were concordant. The most common discordant viruses were rhinovirus/enterovirus, respiratory syncytial virus, and adenovirus. Mean relative viral loads were lower in discordant specimens compared to concordant specimens, regardless of specimen source.
Conclusion: Comparison of clinical and research specimens revealed that respiratory viral detection was similar with or without an added TS. Lower relative viral loads of discordant specimens suggest that a combined TS&MTS may not improve viral detection for clinically significant pathogens.
Keywords: Acute respiratory infection; Nasal swab; Respiratory viral infection; Respiratory virus; Specimen collection; Throat swab.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest Janet A Englund receives research support from AstraZeneca, Moderna, Pfizer, Shionogi, and is a consultant for AstraZeneca, Abbvie, GSK, Meissa Vaccines, Merck, Moderna, Pfizer, SanofiPasteur.
Similar articles
-
Evaluating addition of self-collected throat swabs to nasal swabs for respiratory virus detection.J Clin Virol. 2019 Jun;115:43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 4. J Clin Virol. 2019. PMID: 30978619 Free PMC article.
-
Throat and nasal swabs for molecular detection of respiratory viruses in acute pharyngitis.Virol J. 2015 Oct 29;12:178. doi: 10.1186/s12985-015-0408-z. Virol J. 2015. PMID: 26511714 Free PMC article.
-
Anterior nasal swabs compared to nasopharyngeal swabs for detection of respiratory viruses in children.Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 Jul;112(3):116821. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2025.116821. Epub 2025 Mar 20. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025. PMID: 40153904
-
Use of throat swab or saliva specimens for detection of respiratory viruses in children.Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 1;46(7):e61-4. doi: 10.1086/529386. Clin Infect Dis. 2008. PMID: 18444806 Free PMC article.
-
Nasal swab versus nasopharyngeal aspirate for isolation of respiratory viruses.J Clin Microbiol. 2002 Nov;40(11):4337-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4337-4339.2002. J Clin Microbiol. 2002. PMID: 12409425 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical