Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 7;15(1):88.
doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01290-0.

Validation of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification guidelines for TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm in an independent international cohort

Affiliations

Validation of the 5th edition of the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification guidelines for TP53-mutated myeloid neoplasm in an independent international cohort

Mithun Vinod Shah et al. Blood Cancer J. .

Abstract

The World Health Organization (WHO-5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC) acknowledge the poor prognosis of TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasm (MN). However, there are substantial differences between the two classifications that may lead to under- or overestimation of the prognostic risk. We retrospectively applied WHO-5 and ICC to 603 MN cases harboring TP53mut (variant allele frequency, VAF ≥ 2%). WHO-5 and ICC would not classify 64% and 20% of these cases as TP53mut MN, respectively. Moreover, of those classified, 67.5% would be classified discrepantly. Primary drivers of discrepancies included: (i) prognostic importance of TP53mut acute myeloid leukemia (AML), (ii) interaction of the blast percentage and allelic status, (iii) 17p.13.1 deletion detected by cytogenetics, (iv) complex karyotype (CK) as multi-hit equivalent, and (v) TP53mut VAF threshold, we analyzed survival outcomes of each of these groups with an aim to provide clarity. TP53mut AML was associated with significantly poor survival compared to TP53-wild type TP53wt AML, myelodysplasia-related (AML, MR 4.7 vs. 18.3 months; P < 0.0001), supporting its inclusion within TP53mut MN as a distinct subentity. Secondly, the survival of TP53mut with blast 10-19% was poor regardless of the allelic status. Thirdly, for cases with a single TP53mut with VAF < 50%, 17p13.1 del or CK serve as practical surrogates of biallelic inactivation, obviating the need for an additional copy number analysis. Finally, TP53mut AML, MDS multi-hit/multi-hit equivalent with VAF < 10% had significantly poorer survival compared to TP53mut MDS VAF < 10% without CK and 17p del, and were comparable to those with VAF ≥ 10% (14.1 vs. 48.8 vs.7.8 months, P < 0.0001). Collectively, these findings address key areas of contention and provide valuable insights that will guide future revisions of the WHO and ICC classifications.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: MVS declares research funding to the institution from AbbVie, Astellas, Celgene, KURA Oncology, and Marker Therapeutics. D.H. is a member of the board of directors or advisory committees of AbbVie and Novartis. A.A.K. provides research support to Novartis and Astex. M.P. is a member of the board of directors or advisory committees of Stemline Therapeutics and receives research funding from Kura Oncology. P.G. is a member of the advisory board of AbbVie. N.G. has served on the Advisory Board for Agio and DISC Medicine. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasm (MN) classified by World Health Organization 5th edition (WHO-5) and International Consensus Classification (ICC).
A Consort diagram summarizing the classification of TP53mut MN by WHO-5 (blue) and ICC (green) criteria, along with disease subcategories presently excluded from each classification system, respectively (purple). B Percentage of MN with TP53mut that can be classified, and C not classified using WHO-5 and ICC criteria.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Concordance and divergence in the WHO-5 and ICC classification of TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasm (MN).
A Sankey plot depicting the divergences between the two classifications of TP53mut MN. B heterogeneity in the overall survival (OS) of WHO-5 classified monoallelic TP53 when reclassified using ICC criteria. C According to WHO-5, 90.9% of TP53mut acute myeloid leukemia (AML) were classified as AML-myelodysplasia related (MR), followed by acute erythroid leukemia (AEL, 7%). D OS of AML with TP53mut with variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥ 10% was significantly poorer compared to AML TP53mut with VAF < 10%; and E OS of TP53mut AML was significantly worse than TP53 wild type (TP53wt) AML-MR.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Interaction between blast cut-off and WHO-5 allelic status of TP53-mutated myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS).
A Within the WHO-5 biallelic/presumptive biallelic inactivation group, the median overall survival (OS) of MDS with 10–19% blasts was significantly poorer compared to MDS 0–9% blasts. B Within the WHO-5 monoallelic group, the median OS of MDS 10–19% blasts was significantly poorer compared to MDS 0–9% blasts. C In the MDS 10–19% blast group, the median OS of biallelic/presumptive biallelic inactivation was comparable to that of monoallelic mutations. D While in the MDS 0–9% blast group, the median OS of biallelic/presumptive biallelic inactivation was significantly poorer compared to monoallelic mutations.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Interactions between blast percentage, TP53 mutation (TP53mut) variant allele frequency (VAF), and allelic status based on the ICC criteria and survival of TP53mut myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
A Adverse risk cytogenetic features. BTP53mut multi-hit and multi-hit equivalent. C Higher TP53mut VAF were more prevalent in TP53mut MDS 10–19% blasts and AML compared to MDS 0–9% blasts. D overall survival (OS) of TP53mut MDS 10–19% blast and AML was significantly poorer compared to MDS 0–9% blasts. Overall survival of patients with a marrow/blood blast count of E 0–9%, F ≥20%, and G 10–19% according to allelic status.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Validation and prognostic significance of 17p13.1 deletion and complex karyotype (CK) in TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasm (MN).
A Copy number variation (CNV) analysis confirmed 17p13.1 deletion in 94% of cases where it was observed on metaphase cytogenetics. Additionally, CNV analysis identified loss of heterozygosity (LOH) or copy-neutral LOH (CnLOH) across the TP53 locus in 26.9% of cases without 17p13.1 deletion on metaphase cytogenetics. B In cases without 17p13.1 deletion detected on karyotype, LOH/CnLOH was significantly enriched in the presence of CK compared to those without CK. C Median overall survival (OS) of patients with a single TP53mut with variant allele frequency (VAF) < 50% with either 17p13.1 deletion or CK was comparable to cases with biallelic/presumptive biallelic TP53 inactivation.
Fig. 6
Fig. 6. The median OS of biallelic or single TP53mut VAF < 10% plus CK was significantly shorter compared to that of single TP53mut VAF < 10% without CK and was comparable to TP53mut VAF ≥ 10%.
A The median OS of AML or multi-hit/multi-hit equivalent MDS was significantly worse compared to MDS cases with a single TP53mut VAF < 10% without 17p loss or CK, and was comparable to TP53mut VAF ≥ 10%. B In a TP53mut VAF < 10% MDS, the median OS of biallelic or monoallelic with CK was significantly poor. While the median OS of monoallelic TP53mut VAF < 10% without CK was comparable to TP53 wild type (TP53wt) MDS.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Clinical and molecular characterization of TP53-mutant acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adults.
    Harris EJ, Karaoglu DA, Sukhanova M, Abaza Y, Karantanos T, Eisfeld AK, Anderson C, Lin C, Moreno Vanegas YA, Badar T, Coltoff A, Knepper TC, Ozkaya N, Youshanlouei HR, Cetin S, Patel AA, DuVall AS, Drazer MW, Wang P, Tjota M, Segal JP, Venkataraman G, Gurbuxani S, Cheng JX, Arber DA, Larson RA, Odenike O, Webster J, Shah B, Stock W, Saygin C. Harris EJ, et al. Blood Cancer J. 2025 Aug 14;15(1):138. doi: 10.1038/s41408-025-01350-5. Blood Cancer J. 2025. PMID: 40813576 Free PMC article.

References

    1. Lindsley RC, Saber W, Mar BG, Redd R, Wang T, Haagenson MD, et al. Prognostic mutations in myelodysplastic syndrome after stem-cell transplantation. New Engl J Med. 2017;376:536–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernard E, Nannya Y, Hasserjian RP, Devlin SM, Tuechler H, Medina-Martinez JS, et al. Implications of TP53 allelic state for genome stability, clinical presentation and outcomes in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Med. 2020;26:1549–56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stengel A, Meggendorfer M, Walter W, Baer C, Nadarajah N, Hutter S, et al. Interplay of TP53 allelic state, blast count, and complex karyotype on survival of patients with AML and MDS. Blood Adv. 2023;7:5540–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Papaemmanuil E, Gerstung M, Malcovati L, Tauro S, Gundem G, Van Loo P, et al. Clinical and biological implications of driver mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood. 2013;122:3616–27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haferlach T, Nagata Y, Grossmann V, Okuno Y, Bacher U, Nagae G, et al. Landscape of genetic lesions in 944 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes. Leukemia. 2014;28:241–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances