Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 7;28(3):57.
doi: 10.1007/s11102-025-01526-z.

Consensus and controversies about diagnosing GH deficiency: a Delphi survey by the GH research society

Affiliations
Review

Consensus and controversies about diagnosing GH deficiency: a Delphi survey by the GH research society

M C Arlien-Søborg et al. Pituitary. .

Abstract

Purpose: Biochemical tests are required for diagnosing GH-deficiency in children and adults, but controversies remain regarding diagnostic criteria and type of biochemical tests. The aim of the study is to map the clinical practices of GHD diagnosis in children and adults.

Methods: The Growth Hormone Research Society members initiated a Delphi survey of the diagnosis of GHD in children and adults. Pediatric (n = 18) and adult (n = 25) endocrinologists from 14 countries participated and rated their extent of agreement with 61 statements using a Likert-type-scale (1-7). Consensus was predefined as ≥ 80% of panelists rating their agreement unidirectionally as either ≥ 5 (agreement) or ≤ 3 (disagreement).

Results: The pediatric panel reached consensus on 17 of 29 (59%) statements on diagnosis in children, whereas the adult panel reached consensus on 28 of 32 (88%) statements on adult patients. There was general agreement to test for GHD in an appropriate clinical context and also on the timing of testing for GHD in both children and adults. A subnormal IGF-I level was considered diagnostic in both children and adults with panhypopituitarism. In children, there was consensus to recommend the arginine stimulation test and the glucagon test. The insulin tolerance test (ITT) was considered gold standard in adults and there was also consensus to recommend the macimorelin test. A stimulated GH cut-off < 5μg/l was consistent with severe GHD in children, whereas test-specific cut-offs were recommended in adults.

Conclusion: Consensus on the GHD diagnosis was lower in pediatric practice, mainly with respect to choice and interpretation of GH stimulation tests.

Keywords: Adult endocrinology; Consensus guideline; Diagnosis; GH stimulation tests; Growth hormone deficiency; Pediatric endocrinology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: MCAS has received lecture fees from Pfizer. MB has served as speaker and/or consultant for Sandoz-Hexal, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, Roche, IDS, ConsilientHealth and Pharmanovia. GJ has served as a consultant for Novo Nordisk, Shire, and Astra Zeneca and has received lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, Shire/Takeda, Pfizer and Pharmanova. AG received lecture fees from Pfizer, Ascendis Pharma and Novo Nordisk. BB has served as an occasional consultant for Ascendis, Novo Nordisk and as PI of a research grant to Massachusetts General Hospital from Ascendis. CCS received speaker fees from Novo Nordisk. AH has served as a consultant for Ascendis. PB is a consultant for, and has received honoraria from Novo Nordisk, Ascendis Pharma, BioMarin Pharmaceutical, Cavalry Biosciences, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, and Upsher-Smith Laboratories. PC has received unrestricted research and educational grants from Ipsen, Novo-Nordisk, and Pfizer on behalf of the Service of Endocrinology and Reproductive Diseases, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Saclay and Association Recherche Endocrinologie Bicêtre, has served as principal investigator for clinical trials funded by Prolor Biotech and Æterna Zentaris, has been on advisory boards for Æterna Zentaris and Pharmanovia and gave lectures for Ipsen, Pfizer and Consilient Health. All the fees and honoraria are paid to his Institution or Research Association. EC has received grants and lecture and consulting fees from Novo Nordisk and Pfizer. SC has served as a consultant for Crinetics, Novo-Nordisk and Sandoz, and has received lecture fees from Sanofi. PEC has served as a consultant to Lumos Pharma US and has received grants from Novo Nordisk and lecture fees from Merck. MF has received research support to the Oregon Health Sciences University from Ascendis and consulting fees from Novo Nordisk for occasional scientific consulting. GA is editor-in-chief of Pituitary, CH has received lecture fees from Sandoz, Pfizer and Novo Nordisk. AJ received speaker fees from Novo Nordisk, IPSEN and Sandoz, and received unrestricted grant support from Novo Nordisk and Lundbeck. KKM has received study medication and investigator-initiated research grants from Amgen and has equity in Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), GE Healthcare Technologies, Boston Scientific, and Becton Dickinson. SM has served as a consultant for Novo Nordisk. SJCMMN has occasionally served as speaker or consultant for Novo- Nordisk, Pfizer and Pharmanovia. NK has served as a speaker, investigator and Scientific Advisory Board for Pfizer. LS has served as speaker and/or consultant for Sandoz-Hexal, Novo Nordisk, Merck, and Pfizer. KS has received lecture fees from Pfizer and Novo Nordisk and has served as a consultant for Pharmanovia and Novo Nordisk. PFCS has received travel grants and speaker fees from Pfizer, Merck-Serono, Novo Nordisk, Sandoz and Biomarin. CJS has occasionally served as speaker or consultant for Sandoz-Hexal, Novo Nordisk, Ascendis, Pfizer, Consilient Health and Pharmanovia. HVS has received an investigator-initiated research grant from Pfizer and Rhythm and has served as a consultant for Rhythm. KCJY has received research grants to Barrow Neurological Institute from Ascendis, received lecture fees from Novo Nordisk and Ascendis and served as an occasional advisory board member for Novo Nordisk and Ascendis. JOLJ has received grants and consulting fees from Novo Nordisk and Pfizer and has been on an advisory board for Pharmanovia. In addition, JOLJ is an associate Editor for The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and played no role in the Journal’s evaluation of the manuscript. The other authors have nothing to declare.

References

    1. Collett-Solberg PF et al (2019) Diagnosis, genetics, and therapy of short stature in children: a growth hormone research society international perspective. Horm Res Paediatr 92(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1159/000502231 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Society GR (2000) Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in childhood and adolescence: summary statement of the GH research society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85(11):3990–3993. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.11.6984 - DOI
    1. Ho KK, Participants GHDCW (2007) Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency II: a statement of the GH research society in association with the European society for pediatric endocrinology, Lawson Wilkins society, European society of endocrinology, Japan endocrine society, and endocrine society of Australia. Eur J Endocrinol 157(6):695–700. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-07-0631 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yuen KCJ, Johannsson G, Ho KKY, Miller BS, Bergada I, Rogol AD (2023) Diagnosis and testing for growth hormone deficiency across the ages: a global view of the accuracy, caveats, and cut-offs for diagnosis. Endocr Connect. https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-22-0504 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bright GM, Morris PA, Rosenfeld RG (2021) When is a positive test for pediatric growth hormone deficiency a true-positive test? Horm Res Paediatr 94(11–12):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1159/000521281 - DOI - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources