Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 7;20(1):448.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05772-6.

Role of remote ischaemic conditioning in fracture healing and orthopaedic surgery-a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Alison Buck  1 , Tao Wang  2 , Sheharyar S Baig  2 , Arshad Majid  2 , Ali N Ali  3
Affiliations

Role of remote ischaemic conditioning in fracture healing and orthopaedic surgery-a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Alison Buck et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Introduction: Remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) involves the use of controlled and transient ischemia and reperfusion cycles, commonly of the upper or lower limb, to mitigate cellular damage from ischaemic events. Studies have demonstrated that RIC may have anti-inflammatory and cardiovascular protective effects and thus could represent a novel therapeutic strategy to improve outcomes following orthopaedic surgery. This review aimed to comprehensively describe the current pre-clinical and clinical evidence for RIC in orthopaedics.

Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE via OVID (1966-March 2024) were searched using a systematic search strategy for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effects of RIC on fracture, bone healing, and orthopaedics. Both pre-clinical and clinical RCTs were included.

Results: Three pre-clinical RCTs (comprising of 198 rats in models of experimental fracture) met the inclusion criteria. These showed that RIC was associated with enhanced callus formation (volume and biomechanical strength) post-fracture, reduced oxidative stress and upregulated osteoblastic activity. Sixteen clinical RCTs, involving 628 patients, investigated RIC in 6 different elective orthopaedic procedures (knee, lower limb, cervical, shoulder, general, hip fracture). RIC protocols varied in cycle frequency, duration, and pressure, but all were given as a single dose at induction of anaesthesia. Significant results included reductions in oxidative stress, improved cerebral and peripheral oxygenation, and reduced pain scores and analgesia use. Only 1 study (n = 648) evaluated RIC in acute hip fracture and demonstrated an early cardioprotective effect.

Conclusion: The potential therapeutic effects of RIC in orthopaedic surgery is supported by preliminary evidence from pre-clinical and clinical studies. Trials to date are largely small but warrant investigation in well-powered multicentre RCTs. There are still many unanswered questions about the optimal RIC parameters (cuff pressure, frequency and duration) in orthopaedic surgery and determining which patients may benefit most from this therapy.

Keywords: Elective surgery; Emergency surgery; Ischaemia; Myocardial infarction; Remote ischaemic conditioning; Stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethical approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Protocol registration: This systematic review protocol was not registered or previously published. Competing interests: None

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Postulated mechanisms of action of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC). b Different paradigms of remote ischaemic conditioning (RIC) delivery
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Study flow diagram
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Greenstein AS, Gorczyca JT. Orthopedic Surgery and the Geriatric Patient. Clin Geriatr Med. 2019 Feb;35(1):65-92. 10.1016/j.cger.2018.08.007. - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Fracture Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of bone fractures in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Healthy Longev. 2021;2(9):e580–92. 10.1016/S2666-7568(21)00172-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. GBD 2017 Disease and Injury Incidence and Prevalence Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789-1858. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32279-7 Erratum in: Lancet. 2019;393(10190):e44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31047-5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blom AW, Donovan RL, Beswick AD, Whitehouse MR, Kunutsor SK. Common elective orthopaedic procedures and their clinical effectiveness: umbrella review of level 1 evidence. BMJ. 2021;7(374): n1511. 10.1136/bmj.n1511.PMID:34233885;PMCID:PMC8262448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abbott TEF, Fowler AJ, Dobbs TD, Harrison EM, Gillies MA, Pearse RM. Frequency of surgical treatment and related hospital procedures in the UK: a national ecological study using hospital episode statistics. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(2):249–57. 10.1093/bja/aex137. (PMID: 28854546). - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources