Quality of Life After Augmentation Enterocystoplasty in Children
- PMID: 40336257
- DOI: 10.1111/luts.70014
Quality of Life After Augmentation Enterocystoplasty in Children
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate outcomes following bladder augmentation in children at a specialized third-level center concerning quality of life (QoL), continence status, and sexual function.
Methods: The study population included bladder augmented patients treated over the last 25 years. We established contact with them and emailed an online survey with three validated questionnaires: QoL (EQ-5D-5L), incontinence (ICIQ-SF) and sexual function (FSH/FSM2).
Results: Twenty-four patients, aged between 9 and 44, answered the questionnaire. Among respondents, 54.2% declared experiencing some problem in one or more of the five evaluated dimensions. The mean EQ-VAS score was 80 out of 100, while the mean EQ-5D-5L index was 0,845 out of 1. Based on the ICIQ-SF questionnaire, 58.3% of patients were classified as incontinent. Regarding the bother scale (0-10), the mean score was 4.7 ± 3. Among the 18 patients old enough to answer the sexual function questionnaire, 11 (61.1%) described a low or nonexistent level of sexual satisfaction. Among the male cluster, the average score on the FSH questionnaire was 10.95 ± 6.78 (scale 2-24), while in the female cohort the average score on the FSM-2 questionnaire was 21.5 ± 9.64 (scale 2-32).
Conclusions: Despite the high complication rate and the presence of some degree of incontinence or sexual dysfunction in nearly 60% of patients undergoing bladder augmentation in childhood, our cohort exhibits relatively good QoL scores when compared to those reported for the general population.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
-
- S. Langer, C. Radtke, E. Györi, A. Springer, and M. L. Metzelder, “Bladder Augmentation in Children: Current Problems and Experimental Strategies for Reconstruction,” Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 169, no. 3–4 (2019): 61–70, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10354‐018‐0645‐z.
-
- Z. Kispal, D. Balogh, O. Erdei, et al., “Complications After Bladder Augmentation or Substitution in Children: A Prospective Study of 86 Patients,” BJU International 108, no. 2 (2011): 282–289, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464‐410X.2010.09862.x.
-
- B. P. Kropp, D. Frimberger, and E. Y. Cheng, “Chapter 57: Bladder Augmentation: Current and Future Techniques,” in The Kelalis‐King‐Belman Textbook of Clinical Pediatric Urology, 6th ed. (CRC Press, 2018), 911–948.
-
- L. Merino‐Mateo, D. Cabezali, C. Tordable, et al., “Sexual Function in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA) With Bladder Exstrophy‐Epispadias Complex: Influence of the Incontinence,” JPS Open 5 (2024): 100078, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjpso.2023.100078.
-
- P. J. Cheng and J. B. Myers, “Augmentation Cystoplasty in the Patient With Neurogenic Bladder,” World Journal of Urology 38, no. 12 (2020): 3035–3046, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345‐019‐02919‐z.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources