Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Feb 10;8(3):198-201.
doi: 10.1002/iju5.70004. eCollection 2025 May.

Penile fracture after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Case report and review of literature

Affiliations

Penile fracture after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: Case report and review of literature

Eri Fukagawa et al. IJU Case Rep. .

Abstract

Introduction: Penile fractures typically do not occur in patients unable to maintain an adequate erection. Erectile dysfunction is known as one of the major complications of radical prostatectomy, and no cases of postoperative penile fractures have been reported.

Case presentation: A 78-year-old male with a history of radical prostatectomy with bilateral nerve-sparing for prostate cancer 12 years ago presented with a penile injury sustained during erection. Clinical examination showed subcutaneous hemorrhage and swelling throughout the penis, and magnetic resonance imaging showed discontinuity of the tunica albuginea. Emergent repair identified and corrected a laceration on the right lateral corpus cavernosum. He reported no complications and could maintain an erection after the surgery.

Conclusion: This is the first reported case of penile fracture following radical prostatectomy, as well as the eldest case of penile fracture to date.

Keywords: erectile dysfunction; male urologic surgery; penile erection; prostatectomy; trauma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Magnetic resonance imaging. T2‐weighted imaging demonstrating the discontinuity of the tunica albuginea on the right side of the mid‐shaft of the penis. The discontinuity is indicated by white arrows in the (a) coronal, (b) sagittal, and (c) axial views.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Surgical findings. (a) Intraoperative view showing a subcutaneous hematoma localized to the right side of the mid‐shaft of the penis, consistent with the rupture site identified on imaging. (b) Postoperative appearance of the penis.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jack GS, Garraway I, Reznichek R, Rajfer J. Current treatment options for penile fractures. Rev. Urol. 2004; 6: 114–120. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pandyan GV, Zaharani AB, Al Rashid M. Fracture penis: an analysis of 26 cases. ScientificWorldJournal 2006; 6: 2327–2333. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kumar BN, Akulwar AV. Fracture penis—is it really an uncommon entity? Med. J. Armed Forces India 2015; 71: S211–S213. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Emanu JC, Avildsen IK, Nelson CJ. Erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy: prevalence, medical treatments, and psychosocial interventions. Curr. Opin. Support. Palliat. Care 2016; 10: 102–107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kendirci M, Hellstrom WJG. Current concepts in the management of erectile dysfunction in men with prostate cancer. Clin. Prostate Cancer 2004; 3: 87–92. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources