Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Apr-Jun;29(2):e2025.00026.
doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00026. Epub 2025 May 7.

Comparing Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Zamaan Hooda  1   2 , Deanna Dong  3 , Ahmad Hlayhel  1 , John Paul Bustamante  1 , John Veltri  1 , Franz Yanagawa  1 , Toghrul Talishinskiy  1 , Zbigniew Moszczynski  3 , Derick Christian  1 , Sydney Abaijan  1   4 , Benjamin Rebein  1 , Alan Sori  1 , Scott Wessner  1   4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparing Outcomes Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Zamaan Hooda et al. JSLS. 2025 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

Introduction: Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered the gold standard surgical approach for acute cholecystitis, there has been increased interest in robotic-assisted cholecystectomy (RAC) as an alternative treatment method. This study compares length of operative time and perioperative outcomes between these 2 techniques.

Methods: We identified patients from a single institution between January 1, 2023 and December 31, 2023, who underwent surgical treatment for acute cholecystitis. Gathered data included demographic, clinicopathologic, and perioperative variables. Patients were stratified by LC or RAC surgical approaches. Pearson χ2, Fisher's exact, Mann-Whitney U, and unpaired t tests were utilized to compare collected variables.

Results: We identified 259 total patients, with 186 patients in the LC group (71.8%) and 73 in the RAC group (28.2%). Females comprised most both groups (LC, n = 125/186, 67.2%; RAC, n-n = 48/73, 65.8%, P = .884). Median age at surgery for LC patients was 43 years, and 49 for RAC patients (P = .341). As for operative time, the median duration for LC was 108 minutes and 68.2 minutes for RAC (P < .001). Nine LC (4.8%) patients and 1 RAC (1.4%, P = .192) had postoperative complications. Conversion to open or fenestrated cholecystectomy occurred in 8 LC (4.3%) patients and 4 RAC (5.5%, P = .745) patients.

Conclusions: This study demonstrated that RAC has a shorter operative duration in comparison to LC. RAC also has a similar rate of complications and conversions as the laparoscopic approach. Our findings show that RAC is a safe and feasible alternative approach for treating acute cholecystitis.

Keywords: Acute cholecystitis; Complications; Fenestrated cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Open cholecystectomy; Operating time; Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interests: none.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Unpaired student’s t test results.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sun N, Zhang J, Zhang C, Shi Y. Single-site robotic cholecystectomy versus multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 2018;216(6):1205–1211. - PubMed
    1. Ng AP, Sanaiha Y, Bakhtiyar SS, Ebrahimian S, Branche C, Benharash P. National analysis of cost disparities in robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic abdominal operations. Surgery. 2023;173(6):1340–1345. - PubMed
    1. Meyer C, de Manzini N, Rohr S, Thiry CL, Perim-Kalil FC, Bachellier-Billot C. 1.000 cas de cholécystectomie: 500 par laparotomie versus 500 par laparoscopie [1000 cases of cholecystectomy: 500 by laparotomy versus 500 by laparoscopy]. J Chir (Paris). 1993;130(12):501–506. - PubMed
    1. Aguayo E, Dobaria V, Nakhla M, et al. National trends and outcomes of inpatient robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surgery. 2020;168(4):625–630. - PubMed
    1. Lunardi N, Abou-Zamzam A, Florecki KL, et al. Robotic technology in emergency general surgery Cases in the era of minimally invasive surgery. JAMA Surg. 2024;159(5):493–499. Erratum in: JAMA Surg. 2024;159(5):593. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources