Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Oct;87(10):625-635.
doi: 10.1177/03080226241254768. Epub 2024 Jun 3.

Assessing occupational participation among justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder': Quantitative assessments and their properties

Affiliations

Assessing occupational participation among justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder': Quantitative assessments and their properties

Catriona Connell et al. Br J Occup Ther. 2024 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: There is little evidence for what influences occupational participation for justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' living in community contexts, and no validated occupational participation assessments specific to this group. We assessed a sample of justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' to ascertain what influences occupational participation using commonly applied assessments and evaluated their construct validity.

Method: As part of a mixed-methods study, a purposive sample of 18 justice-involved people 'with a personality disorder' were scored on the Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool and Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two scales. Mean scores were calculated per Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool (MOHOST) item and Occupational Performance History Interview-Version Two (OPHI-II) items and scales and compared to published data. Mann-Whitney U Tests were used to identify within-sample differences based on demographic characteristics.

Results: Participants had low scores on MOHOST items and OPHI-II items and scales. Differences were identified compared to published data. Within-sample differences were most apparent in comparisons by employment status and ethnicity. The OPHI-II scales did not operate as intended with this population and recommended adjustments impacted its construct validity.

Conclusion: Replication is required with a larger random sample. Integrating these data with qualitative exploration would further elucidate factors influencing occupational participation in this population.

Keywords: MOHOST; OPHI-II; Personality disorder; justice-involved; occupational participation; offender.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mean MOHOST item scores. MOHOST: Model of Human Occupational Screening Tool.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Mean OPHI-II scale item scores. OPHI-II: Occupational Performance History Interview–Version Two.

Similar articles

References

    1. Afifi TO, Mather A, Boman J, et al.. (2011) Childhood adversity and personality disorders: Results from a nationally representative population-based study. Journal of Psychiatric Research 45: 814–822. - PubMed
    1. Alred D. (2018) Service user perspectives of preparation for living in the community following discharge from a secure mental health unit. PhD Thesis. Brighton: University of Brighton.
    1. Black DW. (2015) The natural history of antisocial personality disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 60: 309–314. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Black DW, Gunter T, Loveless P, et al.. (2010) Antisocial personality disorder in incarcerated offenders: Psychiatric comorbidity and quality of life. Annals of Clinical Psychiatry 22: 113–120. - PubMed
    1. Brooker C, Sirdifield C, Blizard R, et al.. (2012) Probation and mental illness. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology 23: 522–537.

LinkOut - more resources