Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2025 Apr 7;17(4):e81821.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.81821. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Massive Scrotal Lymphedema in an Adolescent with Intellectual Disability: A Rare Case of Infection-Related Scrotal Enlargement Requiring Subtotal Scrotectomy

Affiliations
Case Reports

Massive Scrotal Lymphedema in an Adolescent with Intellectual Disability: A Rare Case of Infection-Related Scrotal Enlargement Requiring Subtotal Scrotectomy

Muhammad Saqlain et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

An uncommon disorder marked by aberrant fluid accumulation brought on by lymphatic blockage, scrotal lymphedema presents major functional, cosmetic, and hygiene problems. It can be acquired or congenital; the most often occurring causes are infection, persistent inflammation, and filariasis. This case report describes a 17-year-old male patient with intellectual disability who had severe scrotal lymphedema that gradually developed over four years, causing problems with ambulation and hygienic care. Under a clinical examination, the scrotum (40 x 15 cm) was swollen and expanded, hiding the penis but having palpable testes. Ultrasound verified without testicular involvement scrotal wall thickening. After a subtotal scrotectomy preserves the testes, penis, and spermatic cord, scrotal reconstruction was done considering the functional limitation. Chronic inflammatory alterations without filarial organisms revealed by histopathology suggested an etiology connected to infections. The patient healed postoperatively with better mobility and hygienic standards. This example emphasizes the need for early identification and surgical intervention in controlling large scrotal lymphedema to maximize functional and cosmetic results.

Keywords: chronic inflammation; hypertrophy; infection-related lymphedema; reconstruction; scrotal lymphedema.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Preoperative image of massive scrotal lymphedema in an adolescent with intellectual disability, showing extensive scrotal enlargement and distorted anatomy due to chronic infection-related lymphedema.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Ultrasound images of the affected scrotal region
(A) Diffuse hyperechoic areas indicating chronic inflammatory changes and fibrosis; (B) Fluid collection and edema suggestive of longstanding lymphedema. These findings correlate with the clinical and histopathological features of infection-related lymphedema.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Postoperative image following subtotal scrotectomy, demonstrating partial reconstruction with preserved penile structures and a drain in place for fluid management.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Histopathology image showing chronic inflammatory changes with fibrosis and lymphatic dilation, consistent with infection-related lymphedema.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Higher magnification histopathology image demonstrating dense inflammatory infiltrate with no evidence of filarial organisms, confirming the non-parasitic nature of the condition.

Similar articles

References

    1. Scrotal lymphedema and its conservative treatment: a rare complication of circumcision. Akan S, Urkmez B, Artuk I, Urkmez A. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2020;30:94–95. - PubMed
    1. Giant scrotal lymphedema after paraffinoma injection: a case report. Manduaru R, Wallad CK, Ariwicaksono SC. Urol Case Rep. 2023;49:102436. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Surgical reconstruction of massive scrotal lymphedema associated with hidradenitis suppurativa: a case report. Yu Z, Sheng L, Cao W, Li S, Jiang Z. Gland Surg. 2021;10:1800–1805. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Urogenital tuberculosis - epidemiology, pathogenesis and clinical features. Muneer A, Macrae B, Krishnamoorthy S, Zumla A. Nat Rev Urol. 2019;16:573–598. - PubMed
    1. Lymphedema diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up from the view point of physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists. Borman P. Turk J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018;64:179–197. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources