Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;52 Suppl 29(Suppl 29):34-57.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14170. Epub 2025 May 7.

Evaluating the Performance and Implementation of the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Survey

Affiliations

Evaluating the Performance and Implementation of the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Survey

Nicola X West et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the performance and implementation of the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases for periodontitis through systematic review and survey methodology.

Materials and methods: A two-part systematic review was conducted. Part 1 aimed, with descriptive statistics, to evaluate performance metrics of the 2018 Classification, including diagnostic accuracy, prognostic performance and examiner reliability. Part 2 used thematic analysis to elucidate facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the classification. A survey collected evidence of barriers, facilitators and local implementation.

Results: Part 1 of this review included 14 individual studies of moderate risk of bias. Eight studies examined diagnostic accuracy, three studies examined prognostic efficacy and three studies examined inter-/intra-rater reliability. Part 2 included 33 individual studies with data considered at high risk of bias. The survey returned 1113 responses. The thematic analysis in Part 2 led to seven findings, five related to facilitators and two concerning barriers to the implementation. Survey results showed that 78% of respondents currently use the classification, but the most common concerns relate to its complexity.

Conclusions: The 2018 Classification performs well as a classification in comparison with previous classifications. Specific identified barriers have potentially limited the comprehensive uptake of the classification.

Keywords: diagnosis; epidemiology; periodontal diseases; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
PRISMA diagram, as generated by Haddaway et al. (2022).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
PRISMA diagram, as generated by Haddaway et al. (2022).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Age of respondents.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Respondent's reported base country.

References

    1. Aboalsaud, K. M. , Foster N. L., Yu S.‐H., Sweier D. G., and Rulli D.. 2023. “Periodontal Staging and Grading: An International Dental Hygiene Education Survey.” International Journal of Dental Hygiene 21, no. 2: 283–290. - PubMed
    1. Abrahamian, L. , Pascual‐LaRocca A., Barallat L., et al. 2022. “Intra‐ and Inter‐Examiner Reliability in Classifying Periodontitis According to the 2018 Classification of Periodontal Diseases.” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 49, no. 8: 732–739. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alawaji, Y. N. , Alshammari A., Mostafa N., Carvalho R. M., and Aleksejuniene J.. 2022. “Periodontal Disease Prevalence, Extent, and Risk Associations in Untreated Individuals.” Clinical and Experimental Dental Research 8, no. 1: 380–394. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Altman, D. G. , and Altman E.. 1999. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Springer London, Limited.
    1. Arias‐Bujanda, N. , Regueira‐Iglesias A., Balsa‐Castro C., Nibali L., Donos N., and Tomás I.. 2020. “Accuracy of Single Molecular Biomarkers in Saliva for the Diagnosis of Periodontitis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis.” Journal of Clinical Periodontology 47, no. 1: 2–18. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources