Evaluation of a Supervisor Toolkit to Support Autism Provider Use of Pivotal Response Training
- PMID: 40338512
- DOI: 10.1007/s10803-025-06849-1
Evaluation of a Supervisor Toolkit to Support Autism Provider Use of Pivotal Response Training
Abstract
Research emphasizes the importance of fidelity assessment in the delivery of evidence-based interventions for autistic children, but it is underutilized in community settings. There is a need for effective tools supporting provider training and fidelity measurement within usual care autism services. The purpose of this study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a supervisor training suite to support community-based provider use of a naturalistic behavioral intervention, Pivotal Response Training (PRT). This study applied a nonconcurrent multiple baseline design to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and impact of a supervisor toolkit including a PRT intervention fidelity assessment tool and accompanying package of coaching, feedback, and implementation strategies for supporting provider training. Supervisors (n = 5), providers (n = 17), and autistic children (n = 17) participated in the study. Results indicate high levels of adherence to and satisfaction with the Toolkit. Supervisor training in the Toolkit was effective for supporting most providers in successfully using more difficult PRT components and had varied impact on provider implementation of PRT overall. This study contributes to the literature on effective professional development strategies for training providers in evidence-based naturalistic behavioral interventions. The integration of training in the use of a fidelity tool, with planning, coaching, and implementation strategies to support the process, may improve training quality and warrants further research.
Keywords: Autism; Fidelity assessment; Pivotal response training; Supervision.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no conflict of interest. Ethical Approval: This study was approved by the university Institutional Review Board. Informed Consent: All study participants, or their legal guardian, provided informed written consent prior to study enrollment.
Similar articles
-
Improving the feasibility of fidelity measurement for community-based quality assurance: Partial- versus full-session observations of supervisor adherence and competence.Implement Res Pract. 2022 Nov 17;3:26334895221135263. doi: 10.1177/26334895221135263. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec. Implement Res Pract. 2022. PMID: 37091100 Free PMC article.
-
Concordance between Community Supervisor and Provider Ratings of Fidelity: Examination of Multi-Level Predictors and Outcomes.J Child Fam Stud. 2021 Feb;30(2):542-555. doi: 10.1007/s10826-020-01877-0. Epub 2021 Jan 15. J Child Fam Stud. 2021. PMID: 34149272 Free PMC article.
-
Setting Families Up for Success: A Pilot Study of a Toolkit to Enhance the Autism Spectrum Disorder Diagnostic Evaluation Process.J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Mar;54(3):1221-1230. doi: 10.1007/s10803-022-05601-3. Epub 2022 Jun 4. J Autism Dev Disord. 2024. PMID: 35665870
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Behavioural modification interventions for medically unexplained symptoms in primary care: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2020 Sep;24(46):1-490. doi: 10.3310/hta24460. Health Technol Assess. 2020. PMID: 32975190 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baker, T. B., McFall, R. M., & Shoham, V. (2008). Current status and future prospects of clinical psychology: Toward a scientifically principled approach to mental and behavioral health care. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(2), 67–103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01036.x - DOI - PubMed
-
- Baker-Ericzén, M. J., Stahmer, A. C., & Burns, A. (2007). Child demographics associated with outcomes in a community-based pivotal response training program. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9(1), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/10983007070090010601 - DOI
-
- Beidas, R. S., Maclean, J. C., Fishman, J., Dorsey, S., Schoenwald, S. K., Mandell, D. S., Shea, J. A., McLeod, B. D., French, M. T., Hogue, A., Adams, D. R., Lieberman, A., Becker-Haimes, E. M., & Marcus, S. C. (2016). A randomized trial to identify accurate and cost-effective fidelity measurement methods for cognitive-behavioral therapy: Project FACTS study protocol. BMC Psychiatry, 16(1), 323. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-016-1034-z - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Botha, M., Hanlon, J., & Williams, G. L. (2023). Does language matter? Identity-first versusperson-first language use in autism research: A response to Vivanti. Journal of Autism andDevelopmental Disorders, 53, 870–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-020-04858-w - DOI
-
- Bottema-Beutel, K., Kapp, S. K., Lester, J. N., Sasson, N. J., & Hand, B. N. (2021). Avoiding ableist language: Suggestions for autism researchers. Autism in adulthood, 3, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2020.0014 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources