Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Sep-Oct;51(5):e20250203.
doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2025.0203.

Management of Small Renal Masses: Literature and Guidelines Review

Affiliations
Review

Management of Small Renal Masses: Literature and Guidelines Review

Antonio Silvestri et al. Int Braz J Urol. 2025 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) ranks among the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, with a rising incidence attributed largely to the incidental detection of small renal masses (SRMs ≤ 4 cm) through widespread abdominal imaging. Historically managed with radical nephrectomy, treatment of SRMs has evolved significantly over recent decades. Partial nephrectomy has become the standard surgical approach, while active surveillance (AS) has emerged as a viable alternative for select patients, particularly those with comorbidities or limited life expectancy. AS involves serial imaging to monitor tumor progression, reserving intervention for signs of clinical advancement. This review synthesizes oncological outcomes and current management strategies for SRMs, comparing AS with immediate intervention. A comprehensive literature search (2005-2024) was performed across PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus, complemented by an analysis of major international guidelines (EAU, AUA, ESMO, CUA, and Latin American Renal Cancer Group). All guidelines support AS for selected patients with cT1a tumors, though criteria vary. The AUA limits AS to tumors <2 cm, while only its guidelines define clear triggers for transitioning from AS to treatment. Imaging surveillance intervals and biopsy indications also differ, with broader support for renal mass biopsy prior to ablation but more selective use during AS. This review underscores the importance of individualized decision-making in SRM management and highlights areas of consensus and divergence among contemporary guidelines.

Keywords: Adenocarcinoma, Clear Cell; Kidney Neoplasms; Watchful Waiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capitanio U, Bensalah K, Bex A, Boorjian SA, Bray F, Coleman J, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2019;75:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.08.036. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bukavina L, Bensalah K, Bray F, Carlo MI, Challacombe B, Karam JA, et al. Epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: 2022 update. Eur Urol. 2022;82:529–542. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.08.019. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Volpe A, Jewett MAS. The natural history of small renal masses. Nat Clin Pract Urol. 2005;2:384–390. doi: 10.1038/ncpuro0254. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rais-Bahrami S, Guzzo TJ, Jarrett TW, Kavoussi LR, Allaf ME. Incidentally discovered renal masses: oncological and perioperative outcomes in patients with delayed surgical intervention. BJU Int. 2009;103:1355–1358. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08242.x. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms