Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 8;37(1):20.
doi: 10.1186/s43019-025-00272-7.

Does the coronal plane alignment of the ankle and subtalar joints normalize after total knee arthroplasty?

Affiliations

Does the coronal plane alignment of the ankle and subtalar joints normalize after total knee arthroplasty?

Katsuki Yamaguchi et al. Knee Surg Relat Res. .

Abstract

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) alters the lower extremity alignment, potentially affecting adjacent joints such as the ankle and subtalar joints. However, the relationship between changes in hindfoot alignment and ankle osteoarthritis (OA) after TKA remains incompletely understood. The purpose of this study was to clarify whether ankle and subtalar alignment normalizes after TKA and to identify factors associated with persistent malalignment.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients who underwent unilateral mechanical alignment (MA) TKA for knee osteoarthritis. A control group of 40 healthy subjects was used to define normal alignment ranges. Whole-leg anteroposterior weight-bearing radiographs were obtained preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively. Alignment parameters included the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA), tibiotalar tilt angle (TTA), tibial plafond inclination angle (TPIA), talar inclination angle (TIA), and hindfoot alignment angle (HAA). Pre- and postoperative values were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and changes in the proportion of patients within the normal range were determined. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and chi-squared tests were used for group comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression identified independent predictors of persistent malalignment.

Results: HKA improved after TKA (-12° to -2.0°), with corresponding improvements in TPIA (99° to 94°) and TIA (99° to 95°) (all p < 0.001), indicating a significant correction toward neutral alignment. The proportion of patients within normal range increased postoperatively from 16% to 85% for HKA, 26% to 67% for TPIA, 24% to 64% for TIA, and 65% to 73% for HAA. Multivariate analysis identified ankle OA (odds ratio [OR] = 6.62 for TTA), female sex (OR = 2.32 for TPIA; OR = 3.19 for TIA), and varus knee alignment (OR = 2.81 for TIA) as independent predictors of persistent malalignment.

Conclusions: MA-TKA facilitates partial normalization of coronal hindfoot alignment, particularly at the tibial plafond and talus. However, female sex, varus knee deformity, and pre-existing ankle OA independently limit full correction. These findings highlight the biomechanical interdependence between the knee and hindfoot and may guide surgical decision-making and patient-specific alignment strategies.

Keywords: Ankle osteoarthritis; Coronal alignment; Hindfoot alignment; Subtalar joint; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Each author certifies that his/her institution approved the human subject protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the institutional ethical review board of the Faculty of Medicine, Saga University (no. 2022-06-R-05), and the requirement for informed consent of the participants was waived by the institutional ethical review board of the Faculty of Medicine, Saga University, owing to the retrospective nature of the study. Consent for publication: Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Faculty of Medicine, Saga University (no. 2022-06-R05). Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram illustrating the patient selection process for this study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Whole-leg anteroposterior weight-bearing radiographs obtained (A) preoperatively and (B) 2 months after total knee arthroplasty using a mechanical alignment technique. Global alignment of the lower extremity was assessed using the hip–knee–ankle (HKA) angle, defined as the angle between the mechanical axis of the femur (line a) and that of the tibia (line b)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Radiographic measurements of morphometric parameters on whole-leg anteroposterior weight-bearing radiographs. Line (a) represents the mechanical axis of the tibia, (b) the subchondral plate of the distal tibial articular surface, (c) the subchondral plate of the medial malleolus articular surface, and (d) the line connecting the tips of both malleoli. The tibial anterior surface angle (TAS) is defined as the angle between lines (a) and (b), the tibial medial malleolus angle (TMM) is the angle between lines (a) and (c), and the tibial bimalleolus angle (TBM) is the angle between lines (a) and (d)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Radiographic measurements of ankle and subtalar joint alignment parameters on whole-leg anteroposterior weight-bearing radiographs. Line (a) represents the mechanical axis of the tibia, (b) the subchondral plate of the distal tibial articular surface, (c) a tangent to the talar dome, (d) a horizontal reference line parallel to the ground, (e) a line perpendicular to the ground, and (f) a line extending from the lowest point of the calcaneus to the center of the talar dome. The tibiotalar tilt angle (TTA) is defined as the angle between lines (b) and (c), the tibial plafond inclination angle (TPIA) is the angle between lines (b) and (e), the talar inclination angle (TIA) is the angle between lines (c) and (e), and the hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) is the angle between lines (a) and (f)
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Postoperative changes in the proportion of patients falling within the normal range for each alignment parameter

Similar articles

References

    1. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785 - PubMed
    1. Okamoto Y, Otsuki S, Jotoku T, Nakajima M, Neo M (2017) Clinical usefulness of hindfoot assessment for total knee arthroplasty: persistent post-operative hindfoot pain and alignment in pre-existing severe knee deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:2632–2639 - PubMed
    1. Cho W-S, Cho H-S, Byun S-E (2017) Changes in hindfoot alignment after total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritic patients with varus deformity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:3596–3604 - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Jeong BO (2012) Radiologic changes of ankle joint after total knee arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 33:1087–1092 - PubMed
    1. Kim C-W, Gwak H-C, Kim J-H, Lee C-R, Kim J-G, Oh M et al (2018) Radiologic factors affecting ankle pain before and after total knee arthroplasty for the varus osteoarthritic knee. J Foot Ankle Surg 57:865–869 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources