Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 May 8;15(1):16012.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00298-7.

Comparison of rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin 20 mg in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Comparison of rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe versus rosuvastatin 20 mg in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes

Hyo-In Choi et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Studies comparing efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe versus high-intensity statin in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are scarce. In this multicenter non-inferiority randomized trial, 223 ASCVD patients with T2DM were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily or single-pill combination of rosuvastatin 10 mg plus ezetimibe 10 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Laboratory parameters and clinical events were evaluated at 12 and 24 weeks. Primary efficacy endpoint was the least square mean percent (LSM %) change of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level at 24 weeks from baseline. At 24 weeks, the LDL-C LSM % change from baseline was - 13.5 in the high-intensity rosuvastatin group and - 20.5 in the combination group, with the between-group difference remaining within the predefined non-inferiority margin (p = 0.06). Decrease in apolipoprotein B level at 24 weeks from baseline was significantly greater in the combination group than in the high-intensity rosuvastatin group (-15.6% vs. -9.9%, p-value = 0.008). Rates of achieving LDL-C < 55 mg/dL were higher in the combination group than in the high-intensity rosuvastatin group, with a significant difference at 12 weeks (p = 0.01), though the difference at 24 weeks was not statistically significant (p = 0.09). Incidence of total adverse events was lower in the combination groups than in the high-intensity rosuvastatin group (p = 0.048). Single-pill combination of moderate-intensity rosuvastatin plus ezetimibe was non-inferior to high-intensity rosuvastatin in LDL-C lowering efficacy with good safety profile in ASCVD patients with T2DM.

Keywords: Cardiovascular disease; Diabetes mellitus; Ezetimibe; Randomized controlled trial; Rosuvastatin calcium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval: The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of all participating institutions. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all participants involved in the study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart showing the selection of subjects. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percent change of LDL-cholesterol (A) and apolipoprotein (B) at 24 weeks. p-values for analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) test. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Target achievement for LDL-cholesterol < 70 mg/dL (A) and < 55 mg/dL (B) at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. p-values for Chi-square test. LDL-C, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

References

    1. Yusuf, S. et al. Modifiable risk factors, cardiovascular disease, and mortality in 155 722 individuals from 21 high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries (PURE): A prospective cohort study. Lancet395 (10226), 795–808 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yaghi, S. & Elkind, M. S. Lipids and cerebrovascular disease: Research and practice. Stroke46(11), 3322–3328 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grundy, S. M. et al. /ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019;139(25):e1082-e143. (2018). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mach, F. et al. 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: Lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk. Eur. Heart J.41(1), 111–188 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Rhee, E. J. et al. 2018 Guidelines for the management of dyslipidemia. Korean J. Intern. Med.34(4), 723–771 (2019). - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources