Replacement as an aging intervention
- PMID: 40341243
- DOI: 10.1038/s43587-025-00858-6
Replacement as an aging intervention
Abstract
Substantial progress in aging research continues to deepen our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms of aging, yet there is a lack of interventions conclusively shown to attenuate the processes of aging in humans. By contrast, replacement interventions such as joint replacements, pacemaker devices and transplant therapies have a long history of restoring function in injury or disease contexts. Here, we consider biological and synthetic replacement-based strategies as aging interventions. We discuss innovations in tissue engineering, such as the use of scaffolds or bioprinting to generate functional tissues, methods for enhancing donor-recipient compatibility through genetic engineering and recent progress in both cell therapies and xenotransplantation strategies. We explore synthetic approaches including prostheses, external devices and brain-machine interfaces. Additionally, we evaluate the evidence from heterochronic parabiosis experiments in mice and donor-recipient age-mismatched transplants to consider whether systemic benefits could result from personalized replacement approaches. Finally, we outline key challenges and future directions required to advance replacement therapies as viable, scalable and ethical interventions for aging.
© 2025. Springer Nature America, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: G.C. declares potential conflicts of interest related to companies involved in transplantation and aging, including eGenesis, Qihan, GC Therapeutics, Cellino, Rejuvenate Bio and Thymmune (further interests, outside of the scope of the current work, can be found in the Supplementary Note). A.A. declares a potential conflict of interest with Precise Bio, related to the bioprinting of human corneas. S.L., J.R.P., V.N.G., M.S.‑K. and E.V. have no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Biomaterial-based 3D bioprinting strategy for orthopedic tissue engineering.Acta Biomater. 2023 Jan 15;156:4-20. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 10. Acta Biomater. 2023. PMID: 35963520 Review.
-
Gene- and RNAi-activated scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: Current progress and future directions.Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021 Jul;174:613-627. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.009. Epub 2021 May 18. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021. PMID: 34015421 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Dispensing-based bioprinting of mechanically-functional hybrid scaffolds with vessel-like channels for tissue engineering applications - A brief review.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Feb;78:298-314. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.11.037. Epub 2017 Nov 26. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018. PMID: 29197301 Review.
-
Bioprinting functional tissues.Acta Biomater. 2019 Sep 1;95:32-49. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2019.01.009. Epub 2019 Jan 11. Acta Biomater. 2019. PMID: 30639351 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tissue engineering and future directions in regenerative medicine for knee cartilage repair: a comprehensive review.Croat Med J. 2024 Jun 13;65(3):268-287. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2024.65.268. Croat Med J. 2024. PMID: 38868973 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical