Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Acute Gastrointestinal Injury in Non-ICU Elderly Critically Ill Patients
- PMID: 40341485
- PMCID: PMC12405112
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-025-09573-9
Construction and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Acute Gastrointestinal Injury in Non-ICU Elderly Critically Ill Patients
Abstract
Background: Acute gastrointestinal injury (AGI) has a relatively high prevalence among elderly critically ill patients in non-intensive care units (non-ICUs), and significantly influences their clinical outcomes. Therefore, it is important to identify people at risk for AGI and take preventive measures as early as possible.
Objective: We aimed to construct and validate a risk prediction model for AGI in non-ICU elderly critically ill patients.
Design: Case-control study.
Participants: In total, 538 elderly critically ill patients admitted to the general medical department of a tertiary hospital in Shanxi from April 2021 to May 2024.
Main measures: Influential factors for AGI were determined using univariate and multifactorial logistic regression analyses. We constructed a risk prediction model and created a nomogram. The bootstrap resampling method was utilized for internal validation. A total of 151 patients from different time periods were selected for the external validation.
Key results: The multifactorial logistic regression analysis revealed that the independent predictors for AGI were the duration of antibiotic use, number of vasoactive drugs, delayed enteral nutrition, age-corrected Charlson comorbidity index, and white blood cell count, all of which were included in the model and created a nomogram. The Omnibus test showed that the overall efficacy of the model was good (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.807, the corrected AUC was 0.806, and the AUC was 0.796 for external validation, indicating good model discrimination. The calibration curves and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests revealed that the model was well calibrated (P = 0.627, Brier = 0.172 in internal validation; and P = 0.366, Brier = 0.182 in external validation). The clinical decision curves showed that the model had good clinical utility.
Conclusions: AGI is common in non-ICU elderly critically ill patients. This AGI risk prediction model can be used as a screening tool to identify high-risk patients for AGI and assist clinical decision making.
Keywords: acute gastrointestinal injury; critical illness; elderly; nomogram; non-ICU; risk prediction model.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics Approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. The present study constitutes a retrospective study into health services and for improving the quality of care. Informed Consent: Informed consent for participation in the study was therefore not considered necessary. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 39051924
-
[Development, comparison and validation of clinical predictive models for brain injury after in-hospital post-cardiac arrest in critically ill patients].Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jun;37(6):560-567. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240409-00322. Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025. PMID: 40820532 Chinese.
-
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024. PMID: 38517402 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a risk model for identification of non-neutropenic, critically ill adult patients at high risk of invasive Candida infection: the Fungal Infection Risk Evaluation (FIRE) Study.Health Technol Assess. 2013 Feb;17(3):1-156. doi: 10.3310/hta17030. Health Technol Assess. 2013. PMID: 23369845 Free PMC article.
-
Automated monitoring compared to standard care for the early detection of sepsis in critically ill patients.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 25;6(6):CD012404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012404.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29938790 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Chinese Geriatric S, Critical Care Medicine Division Of Chinese Geriatric S. Expert consensus on enteral nutrition support for elderly patients with critical illness in China (2022). Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022;34(4):337–342. - PubMed
-
- Xu PL, Pan AH, Hong JF, et al. Practice of a graded physical restraint regimen in severe neurologic patients. J Nurs Sci. 2023,38(21):67-71.
-
- Chang BL, Rubenstein LV, Keeler EB, Miura LN, Kahn KL. The validity of a nursing assessment and monitoring of signs and symptoms scale in ICU and non-ICU patients. Am J Crit Care. 1996;5(4):298-303. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous