Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 May 8.
doi: 10.1038/s41370-025-00778-y. Online ahead of print.

Review of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from desktop 3D printers and associated health implications

Affiliations
Review

Review of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from desktop 3D printers and associated health implications

Danielle A Baguley et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. .

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a technique by which materials are continually added in layers to form structures. The technique has grown in popularity over the past decade and affordable desktop 3D printers are now widely used in schools, universities, businesses, and hospitals.

Objective: Understanding the types of chemical emissions from these 3D printers and their potential health effects is essential to safely use this technology.

Methods: A scoping literature review on volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from resin-bed and filament 3D printers has been conducted. Most of the published research has focused on emissions from filament 3D printers.

Results: VOC emissions from resin 3D printers have been reported mostly as carbonyl compounds or methacrylate monomers. Filament VOC emissions are more varied in composition reflecting the constituents in the filaments used in this printer. The published research reported that the airborne concentrations of specific VOCs from 3D desktop printers fell below the HSE British workplace exposure limits (WELs). This may suggest that VOC emissions from these printers do not present a risk to occupational health. However, caution is required in reaching this conclusion because most of these studies quantified specific VOC emissions using methods different to those required by workplace regulatory standards. Other exposure circumstances, such as the effect of total VOC emissions, need to be considered, particularly for vulnerable groups, including individuals with respiratory disease, the elderly, or young children. Variables that could increase exposure and risks to health include long print times, multiple 3D printers, and poor ventilation. Research on the VOC emissions from resin 3D printers is required using experimental emission chambers.

Impact: The research discussed in this review focused on VOC emissions from desktop 3D printers and the potential health impacts associated with exposure to these compounds. The review identifies circumstances when people may be exposed to 3D printer emissions for which no regulatory exposure limits apply. This circumstance is especially relevant to people working in small businesses and organisations and to vulnerable people, such as the young, elderly and those with pre-existing lung disease. Raising awareness of these potential health concerns from 3D printer emissions can help to inform actions to mitigate exposure, through policy and behavioural changes, as well as engineering control measures. To our knowledge, this is the first review discussing studies of VOC emission from resin and popular filament 3D printers, including exposure risks and health outcomes.

Keywords: 3D-printing; Fused deposition modelling Vat photopolymerization; Indoor air quality; Resin; Volatile organic compounds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The contents including any opinions and/or conclusions expressed, are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect HSE policy.

References

    1. Mammadov E. Three-Dimensional printing in medicine: current status and future perspectives. Cyprus J Med Sci. 2018;3:186–8. - DOI
    1. Ahmad S, Hasan N, Fauziya, Gupta A, Nadaf A, Ahmad L; et al. Review on 3D printing in dentistry: conventional to personalized dental care. Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer ed. 2022, ahead-of-print, 1–32.
    1. Bharti N, Singh S. Three-Dimensional (3D) Printers In Libraries: Perspective And Preliminary Safety Analysis. J Chem Educ. 2017;94:879. - DOI
    1. Jain PK. Use of 3D printing for home applications: A new generation concept. Mater Today Proc. 2021;43:605–7. - DOI
    1. Manoj Prabhakar M, Saravanan AK, Haiter Lenin A, Jerin leno I, Mayandi K, Sethu Ramalingam P. A short review on 3D printing methods, process parameters and materials. Mater Today Proc. 2021;45:6108–14. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources