Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Jul-Aug;42(4):1544-1553.
doi: 10.1111/phn.13566. Epub 2025 May 8.

Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Spanish Version

Affiliations
Review

Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Spanish Version

José Antonio Cernuda Martínez et al. Public Health Nurs. 2025 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

Background: A standardized tool, the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool (DPET), originally published in English, is available for the purpose of assessing the level of disaster preparedness among nurses, however, a Spanish version is yet to be developed. The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to prepare a Spanish version of the DPET (DPET-SP), and secondly, to analyse the psychometric properties of the new Spanish version.

Methods: The target population comprised nurses in the region of Asturias, Spain. Cronbach's alpha (internal consistency) and item-total correlations (item discrimination) were used to test the reliability of the tool. Construct validity was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The content validity of the Spanish version was estimated using the scale-level content validity index. The appropriateness of the factor analysis was tested using the Kaiser-Meyer-Ollin test. Sphericity of the correlation matrix was examined using Barlett's test. Principal component analysis (PCA) was utilized to categorise the measurement instrument into salient factors. Convergent validity was assessed using Average Variance Extracted (AVE).

Results: The PCA determined that the 45 items could be grouped into five factors Cronbach's alpha value was 0.964, the AVE values for the five constructs ranged from 0.51 to 0.71, the goodness-of-fit of the model structure was good, the convergence reliability values ranged from 0.80 to 0.95 and the square root of the AVE of each individual factor must be greater than all other correlations between pairs of constructs, so there is divergent validity.

Conclusions: The DPET-SP has adequate validity and reliability. Therefore, it can be utilised by nurses for whom Spanish is their first language.

Keywords: disaster nursing; disaster preparedness; psychometric properties.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Abosuliman, S. S., A. Kumar, and F. Alam. 2013. “Disaster Preparedness and Management in Saudi Arabia: An Empirical Investigation.” International Journal of Social, Behavioral, Educational, Economic, Business and Industrial Engineering 7, no. 1: 1979–1983.
    1. Adelman, D. S., C. Fant, L. Wood, and C. Zak. 2019. “Exploring Nurse vs. NP Disaster Response Competencies.” The Nurse Practitioner 44, no. 12: 42–48. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000605516.88939.b8.
    1. Al Harthi, M., A. Al Thobaity, W. Al Ahmari, and M. Almalki. 2020. “Challenges for Nurses in Disaster Management: A Scoping Review.” Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 13: 2627–2634. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S279513.
    1. Al Khalaileh, M. A., A. E. Bond, R. L. Beckstrand, and A. Al‐Talafha. 2010. “The Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool: Psychometric Testing of the Classical Arabic Version.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 66, no. 3: 664–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365‐2648.2009.05208.x.
    1. Al Khalaileh, M. A., E. Bond, and J. A. Alasad. 2012. “Jordanian Nurses' Perceptions of Their Preparedness for Disaster Management.” International Emergency Nursing 20, no. 1: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ienj.2011.01.001.

LinkOut - more resources