Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 24:12:1511358.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1511358. eCollection 2025.

The role of coronary artery calcium scoring in the prediction of coronary artery disease based on non-contrast non-cardiac chest CT scans in airline pilots

Lin Zhang #  1 , Li Li Liu #  2 , Zheng Bin Zhu #  2 , Yan Xu  1 , Kai Chen  1 , Qing Qing Duan  1 , Yu Kai Li  1 , Jie Gao  1 , Meng Song  1 , Qiu Yu Shen  1 , Shao Jie Zhu  1 , Qing Qing Jin  1 , Jian Ping Wen  1 , Shuo Feng  2 , Ying Lu  3 , Run Du  2 , Bin Ren  1 , Rui Yan Zhang  2
Affiliations

The role of coronary artery calcium scoring in the prediction of coronary artery disease based on non-contrast non-cardiac chest CT scans in airline pilots

Lin Zhang et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: The aim of the present study was to explore the value of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) using non-gated, non-contrast chest computed tomography (NCCT) to predict coronary artery disease (CAD) in airline pilots.

Methods: Pilots with coronary calcification found on NCCT were consecutively enrolled into this study. All received a coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) examination. The coronary artery calcium score (CACS) was evaluated on NCCT using the Agatston method. CCTA images were analyzed using a semi-automated software. Coronary Artery Disease Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) scoring categorized coronary stenosis.

Results: A total of 217 male pilots were included, of which 49 were diagnosed with significant CAD (CAD-RADS category 3 or higher). Pilots with significant CAD had much higher CACS (324.28 ± 389.02 vs. 39.16 ± 68.88; p < 0.001). Plaque volumetric measurements showed that total plaque volume (1,103.50 ± 285.51 mm3 vs. 913.18 ± 277.45 mm3; p < 0.001) and calcified plaque volume (149.77 ± 160.71 mm3 vs. 36.42 ± 26.86 mm3; p < 0.001) were more pronounced in individuals in the significant CAD group than those in the non-significant CAD group. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that CACS (odds ratio 1.01; 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.014; p < 0.001) was the only independent risk factor of significant CAD but traditional cardiovascular risk factors, pre-existing medication regimens, or prolonged flight duration were not. CACS positively correlated with total plaque volume (r = 0.156; p = 0.027) and calcified plaque volume (r = 0.434; p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed the area under the curve for the CACS in diagnosing significant CAD was 0.891 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: CACS assessed using NCCT was significantly associated with CAD-RADS category 3 or higher, as confirmed by CCTA, which indicates that it may serve as a robust predictor for diagnosing significant CAD among airline pilots.

Keywords: Agatston; airline pilots; coronary artery calcium score (CACS); coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA); non-contrast non-gated computed tomography (NCCT).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

YL was employed by China Eastern Airlines Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of patient inclusion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Paradigmatic example of CAC by non-contrast CT, severity of stenosis, and plaque volume analysis by CCTA in left coronary artery. CAC, coronary artery calcium; CCTA, coronary computed tomography angiography; CT, computed tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Paradigmatic example of CAD-RADS score classifications based on the study population.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Whole-heart plaque volume by composition on CCTA for patients with significant and non-significant CAD. *p < 0.05 between groups. TPV, total plaque volume; CPV, calcified plaque volume; FPV, fibrous plaque volume; FFPV, fibro-fatty plaque volume; NCPV, necrotic core plaque volume.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Receiver operator characteristic curve for significant CAD.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): global stroke fact sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. (2022) 17:18–29. 10.1177/17474930211065917 - DOI - PubMed
    1. GBD 2019 Stroke C. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet Neurol. (2021) 20:795–820. 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sutton NR, Banerjee S, Cooper MM, Arbab-Zadeh A, Kim J, Arain MA, et al. Coronary artery disease evaluation and management considerations for high risk occupations: commercial vehicle drivers and pilots. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. (2021) 14:e009950. 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009950 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choi Y, Kim K. Effects of physical examination and diet consultation on serum cholesterol and health-behavior in the Korean pilots employed in commercial airline. Ind Health. (2013) 51:603–11. 10.2486/indhealth.2012-0027 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cury RC, Leipsic J, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Berman D, Bittencourt M, et al. CAD-RADS™ 2.0–2022 coronary artery disease - reporting and data system.: an expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North America Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). J Am Coll Radiol. (2022) 19(11):1185–212. 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.09.012 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources