Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
[Preprint]. 2025 May 2:rs.3.rs-6465876.
doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-6465876/v1.

Men's understanding of three different measures of transactional sex: A cognitive interviewing study among men in Rakai, Uganda

Affiliations

Men's understanding of three different measures of transactional sex: A cognitive interviewing study among men in Rakai, Uganda

Holly Nishimura et al. Res Sq. .

Abstract

Lack of valid and reliable measures and inconsistent transactional sex (TS) measurement has resulted in poor understanding of the practice, particularly among men. To improve TS measurement and facilitate comparison across studies, we examined how men comprehend and respond to three common TS measures. We conducted cognitive interviews with 25 sexually active adult men in Rakai, Uganda from November 2021-February 2022 and thematically analysed the data. Most men responded affirmatively to the three TS measures, but there was variation in responses across measures. The two measures that assessed relationship motivation and gendered norms of material provision for sex showed better comprehension and consistency than the measure without these components. For these two measures, a substantial proportion of men responded affirmatively but provided explanations related to gendered expectations of material provision rather than describing provision in a specific relationship which was not the intent of the measures. The measure developed by Wamoyi and colleagues appeared to most accurately measure TS. Our findings support TS measures that include a clear statement of motivation and account for gendered norms of giving and receiving. Given heterogeneity in TS measurement, this study enhances our understanding of common TS measures.

Keywords: Uganda; cognitive interviews; measurement; men; transactional sex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure statement: No competing interests to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Assessment of three transactional sex measures
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Other performance considerations for three transactional sex measures

Similar articles

References

    1. Chang LW, Grabowski MK, Ssekubugu R, Nalugoda F, Kigozi G, Nantume B, Lessler J et al. (2016) Heterogeneity of the HIV epidemic in agrarian, trading, and fishing communities in Rakai, Uganda: an observational epidemiological study. Rev Lancet HIV 3(8):e388–e96. 10.1016/S2352-3018(16)30034-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD (2004) Transactional sex among women in Soweto, South Africa: prevalence, risk factors and association with HIV infection. Soc Sci Med 59(8):1581–1592. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gavin L, Galavotti C, Dube H, McNaghten AD, Murwirwa M, Khan R, St Louis M (2006) Factors associated with HIV infection in adolescent females in Zimbabwe. J Adolesc Health 39(4):596e11–596e18. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.03.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hunter DJ, Maggwa BN, Mati JK, Tukei PM, Mbugua S (1994) Sexual behavior, sexually transmitted diseases, male circumcision and risk of HIV infection among women in Nairobi. Kenya AIDS 8(1):93–99. 10.1097/00002030-199401000-00014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jewkes R, Dunkle K, Nduna M, Levin J, Jama N, Khuzwayo N, Koss M, Puren A, Duvvury N (2006a) Factors associated with HIV sero-positivity in young, rural South African men. Int J Epidemiol 35(6):1455–1460. 10.1093/ije/dyl217 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources