Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 9:9:e55087.
doi: 10.2196/55087.

Evaluating the Use of a Note-Taking App by Japanese Resident Physicians: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

Affiliations

Evaluating the Use of a Note-Taking App by Japanese Resident Physicians: Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study

Taiju Miyagami et al. JMIR Form Res. .

Abstract

Background: Note-taking is a method that has long been used to optimize studying. Recent innovations have seen the introduction of digital note-taking using software apps. Although the current state of digital note-taking has been verified mainly among students, the use and efficacy of digital note-taking by physicians in actual clinical practice remain unknown. Therefore, we sought to understand the characteristics of note-taking residents using a note-taking app and determine whether there is a difference in basic medical knowledge compared to that of nondigital note-taking residents.

Objective: This study investigated the use of a digital note-taking app by Japanese resident physicians.

Methods: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in resident physicians during the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE), a clinical competency examination for resident physicians. The GM-ITE is a multiple-choice test with a maximum score of 80 points. Using a structured questionnaire, we collected data on the sociodemographic characteristics (sex, age, postgraduate year [PGY], or others), clinical training, GM-ITE scores, and the use of an app for note-taking to record case experience. The GM-ITE evaluated the scores by dividing them into 4 groups (groups 1-4), in order from the lowest to the highest. We conducted a multivariate analysis of sociodemographic, clinical training, and GM-ITE score variables to determine the independent predictors of the use of a digital note-taking app.

Results: This study included 3833 participants; 1242 (32.4%) were female, 1988 (51.8%) were PGY 1 residents, 2628 (68.6%) were training in a rural area, 3236 (84.4%) were in community-based hospitals, and 1750 (45.3%) were app users. The app users were more likely to be in their PGY 2, to work in a community-based hospital, to have general internal medicine rotation experience, to use online medical resources more frequently, and to have more time for self-study. The results showed that the app users group had a higher GM-ITE score than the nonapp users group (adjusted odds ratio 0.74, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.22; P=.003).

Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate note-taking by physicians in Japan using apps. The app users group had a higher GM-ITE score than the nonapp users, suggesting that they may have higher clinical skills. In the future, we would like to conduct more in-depth research on the facts of note-taking using apps, based on our results.

Keywords: applications; digital notes; medical education; note-taking; resident physicians.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: YN received an honorarium from the Japan Association for Medical Education Program (JAMEP) as the General Medicine In-Training Examination (GM-ITE) project manager. YT is the director of the JAMEP. KS received an honorarium from the JAMEP as a reviewer of the GM-ITE. KS, TS, and YY received honoraria from the JAMEP as examination preparers of the GM-ITE. All other authors do not have any competing interests to declare.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Participant characteristics. GM-ITE: General Medicine In-Training Examination.

Similar articles

References

    1. Berliner D. Center for Educational Research, University of Massachusetts; 1970. Effects of test-like events and note-taking on learning from lecture instruction—technical report.
    1. Di Vesta FJ, Gray GS. Listening and note taking. J Educ Psychol. 1972 Feb;63(1):8–14. doi: 10.1037/h0032243. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kiewra KA, Benton SL, Kim SI, Risch N, Christensen M. Effects of note-taking format and study technique on recall and relational performance. Contemp Educ Psychol. 1995 Apr;20(2):172–187. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1995.1011. doi. - DOI
    1. Morrison EH, McLaughlin C, Rucker L. Medical students’ note-taking in a medical biochemistry course: an initial exploration. Med Educ. 2002 Apr;36(4):384–386. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01167.x. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. George P, Dumenco L, Doyle R, Dollase R. Incorporating iPads into a preclinical curriculum: a pilot study. Med Teach. 2013;35(3):226–230. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.735384. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources