Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May 9:11:e54911.
doi: 10.2196/54911.

Mono-Professional Simulation-Based Obstetric Training in a Low-Resource Setting: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

Anne A C van Tetering  1   2   3 , Ella L de Vries  1   3 , Peter Ntuyo  4 , E R van den Heuvel  5 , Annemarie F Fransen  1   3 , M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt  1   3   6 , Imelda Namagembe  4 , Josaphat Byamugisha  7 , S Guid Oei  1   3
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Mono-Professional Simulation-Based Obstetric Training in a Low-Resource Setting: Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

Anne A C van Tetering et al. JMIR Med Educ. .

Abstract

Background: Emergency obstetric simulation-based training has increasingly been used to improve emergency obstetric care provision in sub-Saharan Africa. For determining the optimal methodology for effective training sessions in resource-constrained settings, it is crucial to conduct high-quality research.

Objective: We aim to investigate the impact of a train-the-trainer model for providing technology-enhanced, mono-professional, simulation-based training in obstetrics in a resource-constrained setting on maternal and perinatal outcomes.

Methods: A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial was conducted from October 2014 until March 2016 at the medium- to high-risk ward at Mulago National Referral Hospital, Uganda, with an annual delivery rate of over 23,000. The intervention consisted of a train-the-trainer model in which training was cascaded down from master trainers to local facilitators (obstetric senior staff members) to learners (senior house officers). The training of senior house officers was provided to 7 fixed clusters by a computer-generated random sequential roll-out. The training comprised a 1-day (8 h), mono-professional, simulation-based training in obstetrics, and half-day repetition training sessions targeted at every 7 weeks. Both medical technical skills and teamwork skills were taught. The primary outcome comprised a combined maternal and perinatal mortality rate. Secondary outcomes comprised the maternal mortality rate, the perinatal mortality rate, the percentage of births by vacuum extraction and cesarean section, and the Weighted Adverse Outcome Score.

Results: Overall, there were 17,496 births. The combined mortality rate was 9.05% (95% CI 8.37%-9.77%) in the intervention group, and 8.73% (95% CI 8.21%-9.28%) in the control group (odds ratio [OR] 0.98, 95% CI 0.86-1.12; P=.81). No statistically significant change was found in the maternal mortality rate (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.27-2.32; P=.68) or the perinatal mortality rate (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.87-1.13; P=.87). This study did not identify any difference in the percentage of vacuum extractions, the percentage of cesarean sections, or Weighted Adverse Outcome Scores.

Conclusions: This train-the-trainer model for providing technology-enhanced, mono-professional, simulation-based training in obstetrics was not able to change maternal and perinatal mortality outcomes. This study, in combination with literature, suggests that future research should consider multiprofessional team training in obstetrics involving all staff within their units.

Keywords: Africa; LMIC; RCT; facilitator; hospital; learner; low income; low-income setting; low-resource setting; maternal; medical education; middle income; mono-professional; mortality rate; obstetric; obstetric care; obstetric training; outcome; perinatal; pregnancy care; randomized controlled trial; simulation; simulation training; stepped-wedge; train-the-trainer; trainer; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Stepped-wedge cluster randomized design with 7 clusters and 8 steps.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Flowchart of stepped-wedge cluster randomized design. SHO: senior house officer.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and the UN Trends in maternal mortality: 2000 to 2017. World Bank Group. 2019. [16-04-2025]. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT?locations=UG URL. Accessed.
    1. Geleto A, Chojenta C, Mussa A, Loxton D. Barriers to access and utilization of emergency obstetric care at health facilities in sub-Saharan Africa-a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 16;7(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0720-y. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bergh AM, Baloyi S, Pattinson RC. What is the impact of multi-professional emergency obstetric and neonatal care training? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Nov;29(8):1028–1043. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2015.03.017. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ameh CA, Mdegela M, White S, van den Broek N. The effectiveness of training in emergency obstetric care: a systematic literature review. Health Policy Plan. 2019 May 1;34(4):257–270. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czz028. doi. Medline. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chou WK, Ullah N, Arjomandi Rad A, et al. Simulation training for obstetric emergencies in low- and lower-middle income countries: a systematic review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022 Sep;276:74–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.07.003. doi. Medline. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources