Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;207(1):141-150.
doi: 10.1111/bjh.20133. Epub 2025 May 8.

Genomic variant profiling in blast-phase paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia: Predisposing and driving alterations

Affiliations

Genomic variant profiling in blast-phase paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia: Predisposing and driving alterations

Yvonne Lisa Behrens et al. Br J Haematol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Paediatric blast-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML-BP) is a rare and serious condition. Of 231 paediatric patients enrolled in the German CML-PAED-II registry between January 2007 and September 2023, 25 individuals (11%) were diagnosed with CML-BP. To identify genetic variants associated with early onset and disease transformation, we performed whole genome sequencing (WGS), deep targeted sequencing and cytogenetic analyses in 19 cases with de novo (n = 11) or secondary (n = 8) CML-BP and sufficient available biomaterial. Copy number variants (CNVs) were more frequent than single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and more prevalent in secondary than in de novo CML-BP. Recurrent pathogenic somatic SNVs were observed in ABL1 (n = 5, 24%), RUNX1 (n = 2, 12%) and ASXL1 (n = 2, 12%). Nine patients (47%) carried pathogenic germline (n = 8) or somatic (n = 1) variants in either of the genes ATM, CHEK2, FANCM, HERC2, NBN, RAD54B, RECQL4, SETD2 or TP63 belonging to the DNA damage response (DDR). Within a comparison cohort of 19 patients with chronic phase paediatric CML, only one individual (5%) exhibited a pathogenic DDR germline variant. Our study provides novel pathogenetic insights into paediatric CML-BP. The identification of pathogenic DDR-associated germline variants suggests a genetic predisposition with potential implications for patients and families concerning cancer treatment and surveillance.

Keywords: DNA damage repair; blast phase; molecular response; paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia; somatic variant profile; whole genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no relevant conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Variant filter strategy and variant evaluation of whole genome sequencing in the study cohort of (n = 19) paediatric patients with blast‐phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML‐BP).
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Somatic genetic landscape of de novo and secondary blast phase in CML. Frequencies of somatic variants in 19 paediatric patients with de novo (n = 11; left panel) or secondary (n = 8; right panel) blast‐phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML‐BP). Categories of variants [t(9;22) without ACA, high‐risk ACA, large CNVs (low‐risk ACA), small CNVs, SNVs] are highlighted in different colours. ACA, additional chromosomal aberration; CNV, copy number variant.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Overview of pathogenic somatic and germline variants. Categorical presentation of pathogenic somatic and germline variants detected in 19 paediatric individuals with blast‐phase chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML‐BP) (lower panel) shown in relation to blast phase, phenotype and cytogenetics with respect to additional chromosomal aberrations (ACAs) (upper panels). Graduation of variant allele frequency (VAF) is illustrated by colour intensities.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Illustration of genes and gene networks as analysed by the ‘String: function protein association networks’ version 12.0 (string‐db.org) for all pathogenic germline variants (A) and specifically for the nine pathogenic variants affecting DNA damage response genes (B). Known functional interactions between the affected genes are represented by lines, the strength of which reflects the functional association.

Similar articles

References

    1. Jabbour E, Kantarjian H. Chronic myeloid leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, therapy and monitoring. Am J Hematol. 2020;95(6):691–709. - PubMed
    1. Hochhaus A, Baccarani M, Silver RT, Schiffer C, Apperley JF, Cervantes F, et al. European LeukemiaNet 2020 recommendations for treating chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2020;34(4):966–984. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ries LAG, Smith MA, Gurney JG, Linet M, Tamra T, Young JL, et al. Cancer incidence and survival among children and adolescents: United States SEER program 1975–1995. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 1999. SEER Program. NIH Pub. No. 99‐4649.
    1. Meyran D, Petit A, Guilhot J, Suttorp M, Sedlacek P, De Bont E, et al. Lymphoblastic predominance of blastic phase in children with chronic myeloid leukaemia treated with imatinib: a report from the I‐CML‐Ped study. Eur J Cancer. 2020;137:224–234. - PubMed
    1. Sembill S, Gohring G, Schirmer E, Lutterloh F, Suttorp M, Metzler M, et al. Paediatric chronic myeloid leukaemia presenting in de novo or secondary blast phase – a comparison of clinical and genetic characteristics. Br J Haematol. 2021;193(3):613–618. - PubMed