Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):726-732.
doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf069.

The economic costs of alcohol consumption in Lithuania, 2015-20

Affiliations

The economic costs of alcohol consumption in Lithuania, 2015-20

Vaida Liutkutė-Gumarov et al. Eur J Public Health. .

Abstract

Alcohol per capita consumption in Lithuania among the population 15 years of age and older has been among the highest globally in recent decades. Long-term alcohol consumption trends and drinking patterns signal a significant public health problem, as well as social and economic losses. This study aimed to estimate the economic burden associated with alcohol consumption in Lithuania from 2015 to 2020. We used a cost-of-illness methodology with the human capital approach to estimate the economic burden and applied a prevalence-based approach. Using multiyear data, we estimated both, direct and indirect costs. Direct costs included healthcare and childcare, law enforcement, and justice system costs. Indirect costs included costs of productivity loss due to premature mortality. The total economic cost of alcohol consumption in Lithuania between 2015 and 2020 was estimated at an annual average of €542.958 million (in 2020 Euros) or about 1.18% of the Lithuanian total Gross Domestic Product. The highest proportion (65%) of the estimated costs was associated with productivity losses due to premature mortality. Alcohol use places a considerable burden on Lithuanian society in terms of illness, injury, death, and economic costs. Alcohol control policies, in particular excise taxation increases and availability restrictions have been shown to decrease this burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Rehm J, Mathers C, Popova S et al. Global burden of disease and injury and economic cost attributable to alcohol use and alcohol-use disorders. Lancet Lond Engl 2009;373:2223–33. - PubMed
    1. Manthey J, Hassan SA, Carr S et al. What are the economic costs to society attributable to alcohol use? A systematic review and modelling study. PharmacoEconomics 2021;39:809–22. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rehm J, Rovira P, Jiang H et al. Trends of alcohol-attributable deaths in Lithuania 2001–2021: epidemiology and policy conclusions. BMC Public Health 2024;24:774. - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization European Region. Alcohol, health and policy response in the European Union. Copenhagen, Denmark: WHO European Region, 2024. https://www.who.int/europe/publications/m/item/alcohol—health-and-policy... (30 October 2024, last date accessed).
    1. Rehm J, Štelemėkas M, Ferreira-Borges C et al. Classifying alcohol control policies with respect to expected changes in consumption and alcohol-attributable harm: the example of Lithuania, 2000–2019. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:2419. - PMC - PubMed