Comparison of CSF biomarkers in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab and rituximab
- PMID: 40345115
- DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2025.106479
Comparison of CSF biomarkers in multiple sclerosis patients treated with natalizumab and rituximab
Abstract
Background: Patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) treated with the high-efficacy drugs natalizumab (NTZ) or rituximab (RTX) generally show no evidence of disease activity. Currently, there is no head-to-head comparison between NTZ and RTX of neurodegenerative and neuroinflammatory biomarkers in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
Objectives: To compare CSF biomarkers in a stable RRMS cohort treated with NTZ or RTX. A secondary objective was to explore potential associations between CSF biomarkers, fatigue, and cognition.
Methods: This Swedish multicentre cross-sectional study assessed kappa-free light chain (k-FLC) index, oligoclonal bands (OCBs), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neurofilament light (NfL) in CSF of 30 RRMS patients on NTZ or RTX for at least 24 months. A longitudinal comparison of biomarkers was performed for IgG Indices. Fatigue and cognition outcomes were explored in relation to CSF biomarkers.
Results: GFAP level was significantly higher in the NTZ group compared to RTX (mean difference (CI): 2 716 (155; 5278) ng/L, p=0.047). NfL concentration did not differ between the groups. OCBs and k-FLC index were present and elevated in 97 % and 87 % of participants, respectively. IgG-index was significantly reduced only for NTZ. No significant associations were found between fatigue, cognition and the biomarkers.
Conclusion: Our results support that intrathecal inflammatory activity is still ongoing in patients with NTZ and RTX. Cross-sectional GFAP might indicate a lower risk for long-term disability in the RTX group. Our data should be interpreted with caution because of small sample size, making it difficult to control for multiple confounders.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest JH, MCS, IA, MFJ, JZ and AS reported no conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship and/or publication of this article. KK reported no conflicts of interest during the last five years with respect to research, authorship and publication of this article. OH is an employee of Lund University and Eli Lilly, and he has previously acquired research support (for Lund University) from AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen, C2N Diagnostics, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Fujirebio, GE Healthcare, and Roche. In the past 2 years, he has received consultancy/speaker fees from Alzpath, BioArctic, Biogen, Bristol Meyer Squibb, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Fujirebio, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi and Siemens.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous