Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Dec;23(13):2616-2624.e3.
doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2025.03.009. Epub 2025 May 7.

Computed Tomography Colonography in Fecal Immunochemical Test Positives in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Sarah Moen  1 , Fleur E Marijnissen  1 , Jochim S Terhaar Sive Droste  2 , Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel  3 , B W Marcel Spanier  4 , Jelle F Huisman  3 , Evelien Dekker  5 , Jaap Stoker  6 , Ernst J Kuipers  1 , Maarten G J Thomeer  7 , Manon C W Spaander  8 ; CT in BVO Study Group
Collaborators, Affiliations
Free article

Computed Tomography Colonography in Fecal Immunochemical Test Positives in a Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Sarah Moen et al. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Dec.
Free article

Abstract

Background & aims: In the Dutch colorectal cancer (CRC) screening program, fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positives are offered computed tomography colonography (CTC) instead of colonoscopy in case of comorbidities or patient refusal. Literature on CTC in FIT-positives is scarce, and the risk of post-CT interval CRC (PCT-CRC) in this population is unknown.

Methods: In this cohort study, we assessed CTC yield, clinical management, and risk of PCT-CRC in FIT-positives who underwent CTC between 2014 and 2019 in the Dutch CRC screening program. Data were linked with the National Cancer Registry to identify PCT-CRCs.

Results: Of 4506 FIT-positives scheduled for CTC (1.32% of all FIT-positives), 2794 (62%) underwent CTC (median age, 69 years; 58.8% male, 72.2% due to comorbidities). CRC was detected in 160 (5.7%), polyps ≥10 mm in 554 (19.8%), and polyps 6 to 9 mm in 512 (18.3%). A total of 1047 additional endoscopies (37.5%) were indicated for polyps ≥6 mm or CRC. A total of 987 additional endoscopies (35.3%) were performed. Histologically confirmed advanced neoplasia (AN) was present in 590 (21.1%), CRC in 112 (4.0%), and advanced adenomas in 502 (18.0%). Sixteen PCT-CRCs (0.6%) occurred during a median follow-up of 49 months (interquartile range, 36-64 months). Quality reporting was often lacking, and 5 complications (0.2%) occurred.

Conclusions: CTC in FIT-positive screenees was associated with a lower AN detection rate and a higher PCT-CRC rate compared with what is known from colonoscopy. A substantial proportion of complications occurred, and quality reporting was often lacking. This underlines the need for a structured quality assurance program for CTCs performed in FIT-positives. Critical appraisal of who to refer for CTC and communication about the benefits and pitfalls of CTC are warranted.

Keywords: Colorectal Cancer Screening; Computed Tomography Colonography; Fecal Immunochemical Test; Post Computed Tomography Interval Colorectal Cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer