A multicenter survey of pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia practices in resource-limited settings
- PMID: 40346096
- PMCID: PMC12064645
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-00275-0
A multicenter survey of pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia practices in resource-limited settings
Abstract
Caudal epidural blocks are commonly used anesthesia techniques in children. This multicenter study used an interviewer-administered questionnaire in 28 hospitals to describe pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia practice in the Palestinian healthcare system. Devices used to access the epidural space, methods used to ensure the accuracy of access to the epidural space, methods used to ensure asepsis, local anesthetics, additives, and adjuncts used in pediatric caudal epidural blocks were collected. Responses were obtained from 162 anesthesiologists (response rate = 68.9%). Hollow needles were used to access the epidural space and catheters were used to administer local anesthetics, additives, and adjuncts in the epidural space. Aspiration before injection was the most frequently reported method to ensure accurate placement of needles, catheters, local anesthetics, additives, and adjuncts in the epidural space. Bupivacaine was the most commonly injected local anesthetic. During single short caudal epidural blocks, 57.4% of the anesthesiologists reported adhering to full aseptic techniques. The findings revealed significant variations in the practices of pediatric caudal epidural blocks. These variations could be associated with resource limitations, access to materials, local anesthetics, additives, and adjuncts. Developing and adopting evidence-based guidelines might promote congruence in pediatric caudal epidural anesthesia practices.
Keywords: Caudal epidural anesthesia; Children; Cross-sectional; Pediatric anesthesia; Regional anesthesia.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was conducted in adherence to the local and international ethical principles including those in the Declarations of Helsinki. Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Boards (IRB) of An-Najah National University. All anesthesiologists provided written informed consent before they answered the questionnaire. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Epidural pressure changes following caudal blockade: a prospective, observational study.J Anesth. 2016 Aug;30(4):578-82. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2166-5. Epub 2016 Mar 24. J Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27011333
-
A survey of pediatric caudal extradural anesthesia practice.Paediatr Anaesth. 2009 Sep;19(9):829-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03116.x. Paediatr Anaesth. 2009. PMID: 19691690
-
[Combination of clonidine-bupivacaine in caudal epidural anesthesia for hypospadias surgery in children: prospective, randomized, blind study].Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 Jan-Feb;69(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 25. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019. PMID: 30482552 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[Spinal block in pediatric anesthesia (I)].Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1994 Jul-Aug;41(4):241-5. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 1994. PMID: 7938864 Review. Spanish. No abstract available.
-
Evidence-based clinical update: Which local anesthetic drug for pediatric caudal block provides optimal efficacy with the fewest side effects?Can J Anaesth. 2010 Dec;57(12):1102-10. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9386-1. Epub 2010 Sep 16. Can J Anaesth. 2010. PMID: 20845015 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources