Different traits shape winners and losers in urban bird assemblages across seasons
- PMID: 40346104
- PMCID: PMC12064779
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-00350-6
Different traits shape winners and losers in urban bird assemblages across seasons
Abstract
Urbanisation is a major driver of global biodiversity decline, profoundly affecting animal communities. While most studies on bird communities have primarily focused on the breeding season, we aimed to identify species responses and their associated traits by adopting a stratified design and using a multi-season approach considering a gradient from highly urbanised city centres to the urban-rural fringe across six Italian cities. We found that bird assemblages exhibited different responses to urbanisation according to season. Winners (i.e. species positively affected by urbanisation) were characterised by traits such as colonial nesting, high productivity and longevity. In winter, these species displayed generalist foraging strategies and solitary behaviour. Losers (i.e. species negatively affected by urbanisation) tended to be insectivorous, ground-nesting and short-distance migratory species. Interestingly, intra-specific variations emerged, with wintering populations of some species exploiting highly urbanised areas despite not breeding there. Urban adapters, although not strictly winners, displayed resilience by navigating a range of urban conditions, effectively exploiting intermediate levels of urbanisation. This study provides novel insights into the complex ecological dynamics occurring within the urban matrix in different seasons. Our findings emphasise the importance of adopting a multi-season approach in research and urban planning to better understand species responses and develop more effective, sustainable strategies for biodiversity conservation in urban environments.
Keywords: Community ecology; Green cities; Green spaces; Imperviousness; Urban biodiversity; Urban gradient.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Disentangling the drivers of urban bird diversity in the non-breeding season: A general synthesis.Glob Chang Biol. 2024 Jul;30(7):e17421. doi: 10.1111/gcb.17421. Glob Chang Biol. 2024. PMID: 39034889
-
Patch, matrix and disturbance variables negatively influence bird community structure in small-sized managed green spaces located in urban core areas.Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 20;801:149617. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149617. Epub 2021 Aug 14. Sci Total Environ. 2021. PMID: 34411790
-
Migratory birds benefit from urban environments in a highly anthropized Neotropical region.PLoS One. 2025 Jan 24;20(1):e0311290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311290. eCollection 2025. PLoS One. 2025. PMID: 39854505 Free PMC article.
-
Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis.Glob Chang Biol. 2018 Mar;24(3):1046-1054. doi: 10.1111/gcb.13964. Epub 2017 Nov 23. Glob Chang Biol. 2018. PMID: 29080260
-
The effects of urbanisation on ecological interactions.Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2022 Aug;52:100922. doi: 10.1016/j.cois.2022.100922. Epub 2022 Apr 28. Curr Opin Insect Sci. 2022. PMID: 35490874 Review.
Cited by
-
Landscape and Season Influence Bat Activity and Richness in a Mediterranean Metropolitan Area.Ecol Evol. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e71978. doi: 10.1002/ece3.71978. eCollection 2025 Aug. Ecol Evol. 2025. PMID: 40809820 Free PMC article.
References
-
- United Nations. World Cities Report 2022. (2022). https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
-
- United Nations. World Urbanisation Prospects: The 2018 Revision (2018). https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
-
- Foley, J. A. et al. Global consequences of land use. Science309, 570–574 (2005). - PubMed
-
- Grimm, N. B. et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science319, 756–760 (2008). - PubMed