Resection and partial liver transplantation from deceased donors with delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID procedure) for hepatocellular carcinoma: a national, multicenter, non-randomized, prospective trial
- PMID: 40346479
- PMCID: PMC12063376
- DOI: 10.1186/s12885-025-14127-7
Resection and partial liver transplantation from deceased donors with delayed total hepatectomy (RAPID procedure) for hepatocellular carcinoma: a national, multicenter, non-randomized, prospective trial
Abstract
Background: This trial wants to ascertain whether the RAPID procedure could improve graft availability and patient survival in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) setting. RAPID-HCC trial, which aims to decrease waiting times and mortality for patients on the transplant list by adopting a novel surgical approach, could be a major step forward in liver transplantation (LT). If successful, the RAPID procedure could become a new standard of care for LT, addressing the critical shortage of organs and improving outcomes for selected patients with early-stage HCC. We expected to provide critical evidence to support the wider adoption of this new approach.
Methods: The RAPID-HCC trial is a prospective, multicentre study conducted across five major university hospitals in France aiming to assess the feasibility, safety, tolerance, and efficacy of the RAPID procedure on HCC patients. A total of 50 adult HCC patients with preserved liver function (MELD score ≤ 15) will be enrolled and 34 of these will receive a split liver graft from a brain-dead donor (DBD). The RAPID procedure consists in splitting a deceased donor liver and transplanting it into two adult recipients. The operation consists of two phases: first, the donor's left lateral lobe (G23) replaces the recipient's left liver lobe (H1234), while the native right lobe stays to support hepatic function. The recipient's right lobe (H5678) is removed four months later, leaving the graft fully functional. Primary outcomes will focus on the feasibility and safety of the procedure, assessed by successful completion of both surgical stages and monitoring for adverse events. Secondary outcomes will include graft and patient survival, incidence of rejection and HCC recurrence, waiting times and overall patient outcomes compared to conventional whole liver transplantation.
Discussion: Early insights from several studies hint that the RAPID method might improve graft availability and recipient survival. Still, further studies are needed to confirm these benefits, especially for HCC patients. RAPID HCC trial pushes forward liver transplants for HCC patients who still have good liver function. This method could reduce waiting times and mortality in transplant candidates. If successful, the RAPID procedure could be adopted as a new standard for LT. TRIAL REGISTRATION {2A} {2B}: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05971628. Registered on August 2, 2023, before the start of inclusion. Project Code: APHP210351 / N° IDRCB: 2022-A02151-42.
Grant support: This study was supported by the French national PHRC-K Inca 2020.
Keywords: Auxiliary liver transplantation; Delayed hepatectomy; Graft split; HCC; Partial liver transplantation; Two stages hepatectomy.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate {24}: The RAPID-HCC trial has received ethical approval from the National Ethics Committees in France: ANSM – Agence de sécurité du médicament et des produits de santé et Comité de protection des personnes Ile de France III (Ethics approval number 2022-A02151 - 42). All participating centers involved in this multi-centre study, have obtained local ethical approvals as required by French regulations. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to their enrollment in the trial. The consent process will include a comprehensive explanation of the study’s purpose, procedures, potential risks, and benefits. Participants will be given opportunity to ask questions and will be informed of their right to withdraw from the study at any time without any consequence to their ongoing medical care This study adheres to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and complies with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committees. The confidentiality and anonymity of all participants will be strictly maintained throughout the study. Consent for publication {32}: Not applicable—this document does not contain any identifying images or personal or clinical details of participants, nor will such details be included in any future study reports. For access to participant information materials and the informed consent form, please contact the corresponding author. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Waiting time predicts survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry.Liver Transpl. 2014 Sep;20(9):1045-56. doi: 10.1002/lt.23917. Epub 2014 Aug 4. Liver Transpl. 2014. PMID: 24838471
-
Paradigm Shift in the Management of Irresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Living Donor Auxiliary Partial Orthotopic Liver Transplantation in Combination With Two-stage Hepatectomy (LD-RAPID).Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):327-332. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002861. Ann Surg. 2019. PMID: 29916882
-
Section 2. Small-for-size liver graft and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence.Transplantation. 2014 Apr 27;97 Suppl 8:S7-S10. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000446266.42019.28. Transplantation. 2014. PMID: 24849840 Review.
-
Small-for-size grafts increase recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplantation beyond milan criteria.Liver Transpl. 2018 Jan;24(1):35-43. doi: 10.1002/lt.24868. Liver Transpl. 2018. PMID: 28885774
-
Recent advances in the surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Oct 21;20(39):14381-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i39.14381. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 25339825 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72(1):7–33. 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12. - PubMed
-
- Llovet JM, Fuster J, Bruix J. Intention-to-treat analysis of surgical treatment for early hepatocellular carcinoma: resection versus transplantation. Hepatology. 1999;30(6):1434–40 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. - PubMed
-
- Bhangui P, Allard MA, Vibert E, Cherqui D, Pelletier G, Sa Cunha A, et al. Salvage versus primary liver transplantation for early hepatocellular carcinoma: do both strategies yield similar outcomes? Ann Surg. 2016;264(1):155–63. - PubMed
-
- Mauro E, Sanduzzi-Zamparelli M, Jutras G, Garcia R, Soler Perromat A, Llarch N, Holguin Arce V, Ruiz P, Rimola J, Lopez E, Ferrer-Fàbrega J, García-Criado Á, Colmenero J, Lai JC, Forner A. Challenges in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: a review of current controversies. Cancers (Basel). 2024;16(17):3059. 10.3390/cancers16173059. PMID:39272917;PMCID:PMC11394545. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Durand F, Antoine C, Soubrane O. Liver transplantation in France. Liver Transpl. 2019;25(5):763–70. 10.1002/lt.25419. Epub 2019 Apr 1 PMID: 30697904. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical