Multidisciplinary Implementation of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in a Middle-income Country-Real-world Challenges in Malaysia
- PMID: 40346940
- DOI: 10.1111/ajco.14185
Multidisciplinary Implementation of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Early Breast Cancer in a Middle-income Country-Real-world Challenges in Malaysia
Abstract
Aim: Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is not widely employed for the management of patients with early breast cancer (EBC) in Malaysia. We sought to identify barriers to NAT and explore solutions for improving equitable, safe, and timely access to NAT in these patients.
Methods: We used deliberative stakeholder consultation, a descriptive qualitative study design, for data collection. Sixteen breast cancer specialists (seven breast surgeons, seven clinical oncologists, one radiologist, and one pathologist) from 11 tertiary centers in Malaysia were purposively recruited. Deliberations were recorded, transcribed, and thematically analyzed to generate analytical and deliberative outputs. A literature search was performed to ensure that consensus statements were aligned with scientific evidence and clinical practice guidelines.
Results: Four barrier themes affecting NAT implementation were derived: (1) diagnostic delays, (2) lack of access to oncology services, (3) patient low acceptance of NAT, and (4) high treatment costs. We highlighted potential solutions to address each barrier. Seven key areas for improvement were identified across the EBC care pathway: (1) rational use of imaging modalities, (2) biopsy sampling technique, (3) standardized histopathological reporting, (4) patient selection for NAT, (5) marker clip insertion, (6) monitoring during NAT, and (7) surgical axillary management. Expert recommendations for practice-change interventions were in alignment with published international, national, and institutional guidelines.
Conclusion: Barriers to NAT in Malaysia are multifactorial. This study draws on a multidisciplinary stakeholder perspective to define real-world challenges faced by breast cancer specialists and provides recommendations for implementing guideline-recommended practices for NAT utilization in the local healthcare setting.
Keywords: barriers | early breast cancer | implementation | multidisciplinary | neoadjuvant therapy.
© 2025 John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
References
-
- M. Kaufmann, G. V. von Minckwitz, R. Smith, et al., “International Expert Panel on the Use of Primary (preoperative) Systemic Treatment of Operable Breast Cancer: Review and Recommendation,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 21 (2003): 2600–2608.
-
- L. A. Korde, M. R. Somerfield, L. A. Carey, et al., “Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline,” Journal of Clinical Oncology 39 (2020): 1485–1505.
-
- F. Cardoso, S. Kyriakides, S. Ohno, et al., “Early Breast Cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow‐up,” Annals of Oncology 30 (2019): 1194–1220.
-
- H. J. Burstein, G. Curigliano, S. Loibl, et al., “Estimating the Benefits of Therapy for Early‐stage Breast Cancer: The St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2019,” Annals of Oncology 30 (2019): 1541–1557.
-
- D. Mauri, N. Pavlidis, and J. P. Ioannidis, “Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Meta‐analysis,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute 97 (2005): 188–194.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
