Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul;40(7):1818-1824.
doi: 10.1111/jgh.16997. Epub 2025 May 10.

Performance of the GALAD Model in an Asian Cohort Undergoing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Prospective Cohort Study

Affiliations

Performance of the GALAD Model in an Asian Cohort Undergoing Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: A Prospective Cohort Study

Wei-Lun Liou et al. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aim: Current hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance strategy has its limitations, consequently delaying early detection. The GALAD model has been validated in retrospective studies, with two published cut-off values yielding different sensitivities for HCCs of different etiologies. We evaluated the performance of GALAD model in HCC surveillance and determined the ideal cut-off value for our cohort.

Methods: Patients undergoing 6-monthly HCC surveillance in Singapore General Hospital were recruited between December 2017-October 2018. Study serum specimens were prospectively collected and retrospectively tested using the μTASWako alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and protein induced by vitamin K antagonism-II (PIVKA-II) kits. GALAD score was calculated and compared with individual biomarkers using area under the curve (AUC) analysis. Published GALAD cut-offs of -0.63 and -1.95 were compared for their performance in HCC detection.

Results: There were 207 patients (median age 59 years, 55.1% males). Hepatitis B was the commonest etiology (72.9%). By February 2023, with a median follow-up of 48.9 months, 20 patients had developed HCC. Eight patients developed HCC within 1 year from specimen collection. For HCC developing within 1 year, GALAD model detected HCC with an AUC of 0.84, greater than AFP (AUC 0.77), AFP-L3 (AUC 0.60), and PIVKA-II (AUC 0.67). GALAD at cut-off -1.95 achieved sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 92.5% for HCCs detected within 1 year, superior to cut-off -0.63 (sensitivity 12.5%, specificity 100%).

Conclusion: In this prospective study of HCC surveillance, the GALAD model performed better than individual biomarkers. The cut-off of -1.95 was more useful in our predominantly chronic hepatitis B cohort.

Keywords: GALAD; chronic hepatitis B; hepatocellular carcinoma; hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance; tumor biomarkers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel, et al., “Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 71, no. 3 (2021): 209–249, https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660.
    1. A. G. Singal, S. Mittal, O. A. Yerokun, et al., “Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening Associated With Early Tumor Detection and Improved Survival Among Patients With Cirrhosis in the US,” American Journal of Medicine 130, no. 9 (2017): 1099–1106.e1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2017.01.021.
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver, “Electronic Address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma,” Journal of Hepatology 69, no. 1 (2018): 182–236, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019 Erratum in: J Hepatol. 2019 Apr;70(4):817. PMID: 29628281.
    1. A. G. Singal, J. M. Llovet, M. Yarchoan, et al., “AASLD Practice Guidance on Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma [Published Correction Appears in Hepatology]. 2023 Dec 1;78(6):E105,” Hepatology 78, no. 6 (2023): 1922–1965 PMID: 37199193; PMCID: PMC10663390.
    1. M. Omata, A. L. Cheng, N. Kokudo, et al., “Asia‐Pacific Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A 2017 Update,” Hepatology International 11, no. 4 (2017): 317–370, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072‐017‐9799‐9 PMID: 28620797; PMCID: PMC5491694.

MeSH terms

Grants and funding

LinkOut - more resources