Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;157(3):427-435.
doi: 10.1002/ijc.35415. Epub 2025 May 9.

Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients

Affiliations

Sex differences in cancer mortality among solid organ transplant recipients

Sarah S Jackson et al. Int J Cancer. .

Abstract

Males have increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis than females, possibly due to poorer immunosurveillance. We tested whether the female survival advantage is lost with immunosuppression by evaluating 17,048 cancer patients (68% male) with a prior solid organ transplant using data from the US Transplant Cancer Match Study and 1,221,914 cancer patients (58% male) from the general population using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. We evaluated 13 solid cancers that occur in both sexes. We compared mortality due to cancer in males and females using a male:female hazard ratio (M:F HR) derived from Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, diagnosis year, stage, and cancer treatment. Among cancer patients in the general population, males had higher cancer-specific mortality than females for cancers of the lip, stomach, colorectum, anus, liver, lung, skin, brain, and thyroid, with M:F HRs ranging from 1.06 to 1.59. Only colorectal cancer showed an attenuation in the female mortality advantage in transplant recipients (M:F HRTransplant: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.77, 1.03; vs. M:F HRGenPop: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.06, 1.08; P-interaction = 0.007). Among kidney cancer patients, the female mortality advantage was stronger in the transplant population (M:F HRTransplant: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.60; M:F HRGenPop: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.99, 1.04; P-interaction = 0.003). Overall, we did not find consistent evidence that the female advantage in cancer mortality is weakened among immunosuppressed transplant recipients, suggesting that non-immune factors contribute to the female advantage among cancer patients in the general population.

Keywords: cancer; immunosurveillance; mortality; organ transplantation; sex differences.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests

References

    1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Wagle NS, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2023. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 2023;73(1):17–48. - PubMed
    1. Radkiewicz C, Johansson ALV, Dickman PW, et al. Sex differences in cancer risk and survival: A Swedish cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2017;84:130–140. - PubMed
    1. Cook MB, McGlynn KA, Devesa SS, et al. Sex disparities in cancer mortality and survival. Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 2011;20(8):1629–1637. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Engels EA. Epidemiologic perspectives on immunosuppressed populations and the immunosurveillance and immunocontainment of cancer. Am J Transplant 2019;19(12):3223–3232. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fish EN. The X-files in immunity: sex-based differences predispose immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2008;8(9):737–44. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources