Long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis of the phase 3 U-ACTIVATE long-term extension study
- PMID: 40347957
- DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00017-2
Long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: an interim analysis of the phase 3 U-ACTIVATE long-term extension study
Abstract
Background: The U-ACTIVATE long-term extension study aims to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Here, we report interim results after 3 years of total treatment.
Methods: U-ACTIVATE is an ongoing, 288-week, phase 3, long-term extension study done at 307 centres across 43 countries (active sites on Dec 31, 2021, are presented as part of this interim analysis) and began on Jan 31, 2017. In brief, patients aged 16-75 years with a confirmed diagnosis of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis for 90 days or more, an adapted Mayo score of 5-9, and an endoscopic subscore of 2 or 3 were eligible for the upadacitinib induction studies; patients who had a clinical response in the induction studies were eligible to enter the U-ACHIEVE maintenance study. Individuals who completed the U-ACHIEVE maintenance study were subsequently eligible for inclusion in the efficacy population of this long-term extension study. Patients in clinical remission per adapted Mayo score at week 52 of the maintenance study could continue their double-masked treatment upon entering the long-term extension study. Patients not in clinical remission originally randomly assigned to upadacitinib 15 mg were eligible to escalate to upadacitinib 30 mg, those originally randomly assigned to upadacitinib 30 mg continued on upadacitinib 30 mg, and those originally assigned to placebo were eligible to escalate to upadacitinib 15 mg in a masked way. We present data from weeks 48 and 96 of the long-term extension period. Key efficacy outcomes were clinical remission (per adapted Mayo score), endoscopic remission, maintenance of clinical remission, and maintenance of endoscopic remission, and are presented for those patients who had a clinical response after 8 weeks of upadacitinib 45 mg induction, completed 52 weeks of maintenance (U-ACHIEVE maintenance), and subsequently entered the long-term extension. Safety outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events and adverse events of special interest, which were prespecified and were recorded in two populations: one comprising patients who received at least one dose of study drug in the long-term extension study and the other comprising all patients in the maintenance or long-term extension studies. Our primary approach for efficacy analysis was as-observed (ie, all observed data were used without imputation for missing data until patients switched to a different dose during the long-term extension study). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03006068).
Findings: 414 patients from the phase 3 upadacitinib U-ACHIEVE maintenance study were eligible to enter this long-term extension study for assessment of efficacy endpoints following treatment with upadacitinib. Of these individuals, 369 patients (231 [63%] male individuals and 138 [37%] female individuals) were treated with upadacitinib in the long-term extension study: 142 patients with upadacitinib 15 mg and 227 with upadacitinib 30 mg. In the as-observed population, 84 (71%) of 118 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg were in clinical remission at week 48, as were 130 (67%) of 193 receiving upadacitinib 30 mg; by week 96, 69 (76%) of 91 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 104 (74%) of 141 of those receiving upadacitinib 30 mg were in clinical remission. Most patients who entered the long-term extension in clinical remission maintained it in the as-observed analysis (week 48 upadacitinib 15 mg 62 [81%] of 77 and upadacitinib 30 mg 90 [81%] of 111; week 96 upadacitinib 15 mg 50 [78%] of 64 and upadacitinib 30 mg 69 [84%] of 82). In the as-observed population, 60 (49%) of 123 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 93 (46%) of 202 receiving upadacitinib 30 mg were in endoscopic remission at week 48; by week 96, 45 (47%) of 95 patients receiving upadacitinib 15 mg and 69 (45%) of 153 receiving upadacitinib 30 mg were in endoscopic remission. Most patients who entered the long-term extension in endoscopic remission maintained it in the as-observed analysis (week 48 upadacitinib 15 mg 28 [70%] of 40 and upadacitinib 30 mg 51 [76%] of 67; week 96 upadacitinib 15 mg 20 [65%] of 31 and upadacitinib 30 mg 37 [73%] of 51). In the long-term extension-only safety analysis, we assessed data from 467 patients, representing 1027·9 patient-years of continuous long-term extension exposure on a consistent upadacitinib dose. Treatment-emergent adverse events were recorded at 238·5 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and 233·4 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 30 mg. Event rates of serious treatment-emergent adverse events were 11·7 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 15 mg and 12·4 events per 100 patient-years for upadacitinib 30 mg. The most common adverse events of special interest were hepatic disorder, lymphopenia, creatine phosphokinase elevation, serious infection, neutropenia, and herpes zoster. Three treatment-emergent adverse events leading to death were reported in the long-term extension-only safety population.
Interpretation: This interim analysis supports the positive long-term risk-benefit profile for upadacitinib 15 mg and 30 mg among patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Funding: AbbVie.
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests RP has received consulting fees from Abbott, AbbVie, Abivax, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, AnaptysBio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Cosmos Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Elan, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Galapagos, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pendopharm, Pfizer, Progenity, Prometheus Biosciences, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Satisfai Health, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Spyre Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Theravance Biopharma, Trellus, Union Biopharma, Ventyx, Viatris, and UCB; has received speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Merck, Organon, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, and Takeda Pharmaceuticals; and has received advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alimentiv (formerly Robarts), Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, JAMP Bio, Janssen, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Oppilan Pharma, Organon, Pandion Pharma, Pfizer, Progenity, Protagonist Therapeutics, Roche, Sandoz, Shire, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda Pharmaceuticals, and Ventyx. SV has received grants from AbbVie, Galapagos, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, and Takeda; consulting fees from AbbVie, Abivax, Alimentiv, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Avaxia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Dr Falk Pharma, Ferring, Galapagos, Genentech-Roche, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, MSD, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Prodigest, Progenity, Prometheus, Second Genome, Shire, Takeda, Theravance, and Tillotts Pharma; and speaker fees from AbbVie, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda. SD has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Enthera, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gilead, Hospira, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, MSD, Mundipharma, Mylan, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sublimity Therapeutics, Takeda, TiGenix, UCB, and Vifor. PDRH has received grants from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, the US National Institutes of Health, and Pfizer; has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Buhlmann Labs, Curacle, and the Gastrointestinal Health Foundation; and is a member of the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation. GRL has received consulting fees from AbbVie, American Regent, Bristol Meyers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Endo Pharmaceuticals, Ferring, Fresenius Kabi, Gilead, Janssen Orthobiotech, Med Ed Consultants, Pfizer, Pharmacosmos, Prometheus Laboratories, Sandoz, Takeda, and UCB; honoraria from AbbVie, Allergan, the American Gastroenterological Association, American Regent, Focus Medical Communication, the journal Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IBD Horizons, Ironwood, the Pennsylvania Society of Gastroenterology, Physician Education Resource, Professional Communication Corporation, SLACK, Springer Science and Business Media, Vindico, and Wolters Kluwer; research grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Janssen Orthobiotech, Pfizer, Takeda, and UCB; and fees for a data safety monitoring board from Eli Lilly. HN has received consulting fees from AbbVie and Janssen; speaker fees from AbbVie, Daiichi Sankyo, EA Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Miyarisan Pharmaceutical, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, Takeda Pharmaceutical, and Viatris; advisory board fees from AbbVie, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Mochida Pharmaceutical; grants from AbbVie, Celgene, Daiichi Sankyo, EA Pharma, Janssen Pharmaceutical, JIMRO, Kissei Pharmaceutical, Kyorin Pharmaceutical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Mochida Pharmaceutical, Nippon Kayaku, Pfizer, Takeda, and Zeria Pharmaceutical; and grants for commissioned or joint research from AbbVie, Hoya Group Pentax Medical, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, and Mochida Pharmaceutical. SG has received consulting fees from AbbVie, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Takeda; and advisory board fees for Janssen. J-FC has received personal fees from AbbVie, Allergan, Amgen, AnaptysBio, Arena Pharamaceuticals, Astellas Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Ensho, Enterome, Envision, Ferring, Galmed Research, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Iterative Scopes, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson, Kaleido Biosciences, Landos, MedImmune, Merck, Microba Life Science, Novartis, Otsuka Pharmaceutical, Pfizer, PPM Services, Protagonist, Sanofi, Second Genome, Seres, Shire, Sun, Takeda, Theradiag, TiGenix, Vedanta Biosciences, Vifor, and Union; grants from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, and Takeda; and holds stock options in Intestinal Biotech Development. JE, MK, VR, XY, ZG, HP, DS, and SSu are full-time employees of AbbVie and hold AbbVie stock or stock options. SSc has received advisory board fees from AbbVie, Alfasigma, Arena, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Fresenius, Gilead, I-Mab, Janssen, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, ProventionBio, Takeda, and Ventyx; speaker fees from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Falk, Ferring, Galapagos, Janssen, Pfizer, and Takeda; and personal fees from AbbVie, Alfasigma, Arena, Biogen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Celltrion, Eli Lilly, Falk, Ferring, Fresenius, Galapagos, Gilead, I-Mab, Janssen, Pfizer, Protagonist Therapeutics, ProventionBio, Takeda, and Ventyx.
Comment in
-
U-ACTIVATE long-term efficacy and safety outcomes for upadacitinib in ulcerative colitis.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025 Jun;10(6):492-493. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(25)00046-9. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025. PMID: 40347952 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and safety of upadacitinib maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in patients responding to 8 week induction therapy (U-ACHIEVE Maintenance): overall results from the randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 maintenance study.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023 Nov;8(11):976-989. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00208-X. Epub 2023 Sep 9. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023. PMID: 37683686 Clinical Trial.
-
Upadacitinib as induction and maintenance therapy for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis: results from three phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised trials.Lancet. 2022 Jun 4;399(10341):2113-2128. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00581-5. Epub 2022 May 26. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35644166 Clinical Trial.
-
Etrolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis in patients previously treated with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (HICKORY): a phase 3, randomised, controlled trial.Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Feb;7(2):128-140. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00298-3. Epub 2021 Nov 17. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 34798039 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and safety of advanced therapies for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis in induction and maintenance: systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.J Comp Eff Res. 2025 May;14(5):e240225. doi: 10.57264/cer-2024-0225. Epub 2025 Mar 17. J Comp Eff Res. 2025. PMID: 40095567 Free PMC article.
-
Oral Janus kinase inhibitors for maintenance of remission in ulcerative colitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 27;1(1):CD012381. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012381.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 31984480 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials