Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep-Oct;53(7):756-763.
doi: 10.1111/ceo.14549. Epub 2025 May 9.

Outcomes of Stent Removal in Eyes With the Paul Glaucoma Implant With Intraluminal 6-0 Polypropylene

Affiliations

Outcomes of Stent Removal in Eyes With the Paul Glaucoma Implant With Intraluminal 6-0 Polypropylene

Nicole Shu-Wen Chan et al. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Sep-Oct.

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the 12-month outcomes of stent removal in eyes with the Paul Glaucoma Implant (PGI) and intraluminal 6-0 polypropylene in an Asian population.

Methods: Retrospective review of patients ≥ 18 years of age with glaucoma in a tertiary institution, who underwent the PGI stented with intraluminal 6-0 polypropylene (October 2018 to January 2023), with a minimum follow-up duration of 12 months. The main outcome measures were intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications.

Results: We included 103 eyes of 97 patients, who were mostly Chinese (73.8%). The stent was removed in 43 eyes (41.7%), at a median of 12.3 (interquartile range: 4.1-18.4) postoperative weeks. The mean IOP reduction immediately following stent removal was -6.4 ± 5.0 mmHg, and there was a strong linear correlation with the IOP before stent removal (Pearson correlation -0.554; p < 0.001). No eyes developed hypotony after stent removal.

Conclusions: Less than half of the eyes with PGI stented with intraluminal 6-0 polypropylene required stent removal. The IOP reduction achieved after stent removal correlated with the IOP before stent removal, and there were no complications of hypotony.

Keywords: Paul glaucoma implant; polypropylene; stent; stent removal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. N. A. Vallabh , F. Mason , J. T. S. Yu , et al., “Surgical Technique, Perioperative Management and Early Outcome Data of the PAUL® Glaucoma Drainage Device,” Eye 36, no. 10 (2022): 1905–1910.
    1. C. Weber , S. Hundertmark , R. Liegl , et al., “Clinical Outcomes of the PAUL® Glaucoma Implant: One‐Year Results,” Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 51, no. 6 (2023): 566–576.
    1. P. José , R. C. Barão , F. J. Teixeira , et al., “One‐Year Efficacy and Safety of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant Using a Standardized Surgical Protocol,” Journal of Glaucoma 31, no. 3 (2022): 201–205.
    1. M. C. J. Tan , H. Y. C. Choy , V. Koh Teck Chang , et al., “Two‐Year Outcomes of the Paul Glaucoma Implant for Treatment of Glaucoma,” Journal of Glaucoma 31, no. 6 (2022): 449–455.
    1. V. Koh , P. Chew , G. Triolo , et al., “Treatment Outcomes Using the PAUL Glaucoma Implant to Control Intraocular Pressure in Eyes With Refractory Glaucoma,” Ophthalmology Glaucoma 3, no. 5 (2020): 350–359.

LinkOut - more resources