Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May 10;25(1):325.
doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-06008-2.

Occupational therapy and registered dietitian services to reduce fall risk among home delivered meal clients: a randomized controlled feasibility trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Occupational therapy and registered dietitian services to reduce fall risk among home delivered meal clients: a randomized controlled feasibility trial

Lisa A Juckett et al. BMC Geriatr. .

Abstract

Background: Older adults increasingly prefer to age in place, but health and safety risks often threaten this independence. Home delivered meals, a key service under the Older Americans Act, provide essential nutritional support to homebound older adults, the majority of whom are at elevated risk for fall-related morbidity and mortality. Given the complex health conditions of homebound older adults, we conducted a feasibility randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate our methods for testing four different service models designed to help reduce fall risk among home delivered meal recipients: (1) meals alone; (2) meals + registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) services; (3) meals + occupational therapy (OT) services; or (4) meals + RDN + OT services. Findings will inform protocol modifications for our definitive RCT to improve fall-related outcomes among this population.

Methods: A four-arm, parallel-group feasibility RCT was conducted with one home delivered meal agency in the Midwest United States. Participants were eligible to participate if they were over 60 years old, were able to receive meals from our partner agency, had one diet-related health condition, and were at risk for falling. Feasibility outcomes included study eligibility, recruitment, retention, fidelity to RDN and OT services, and service acceptability.

Results: Of 442 screened clients, 31% were eligible for participation, and 41% of eligible individuals were recruited (N = 56). Retention at three months was 79%. Fidelity rates were 84.5% for RDN services and 90.2% for OT services. Participants expressed high satisfaction with meal convenience and staff interactions but noted areas for improvement, including meal taste and inconsistent meal deliveries (e.g., timeliness; receiving correct meals).

Conclusions: The study identified several barriers to scaling this trial, including restrictive eligibility criteria and recruitment challenges. Protocol modifications for the definitive trial include broader eligibility, expanded recruitment areas, and increased flexibility in meal selection. Randomization procedures will also be adjusted to account for participants from the same household. This feasibility trial demonstrates the potential for integrating RDN and OT services into home delivered meal programs to address recipients' fall-related needs.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov; NCT06059404; 22/09/2023.

Keywords: Feasibility study; Home delivered meals; Homebound; Medical dietetics; Nutrition; Occupational therapy; Older adults; Randomized clinical trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This trial complied with the ethical rules stated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all study participants. Study activities were approved by the Institutional Review Board at The Ohio State University (#2023H0248). Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overview of participant recruitment and retention

References

    1. 2021 AARP home and community preferences survey. AARP. https://www.aarp.org/pri/topics/livable-communities/housing/2021-home-co.... Accessed 16 Jan 2025.
    1. Liu M, Peng W, Miyawaki CE, Mo C, Luo Y, Gong N. The bidirectional relationship between homebound status and falls among older adults: a longitudinal study. BMC Geriatr. 2022;22:923. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ornstein KA, Garrido MM, Bollens-Lund E, Husain M, Ferreira K, Kelley AS, et al. Estimation of the incident homebound population in the US among older Medicare beneficiaries, 2012 to 2018. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180:1022–5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siegler EL, Lama SD, Knight MG, Laureano E, Reid MC. Community-based supports and services for older adults: a primer for clinicians. J Geriatr. 2015;2015:678625. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wang Q, Fan K, Li P. Effect of the Use of home and community care services on the multidimensional health of older adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:15402. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data