Navigating weight stigma: An integrative review of midwives' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about caring for larger-bodied women
- PMID: 40349478
- DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2025.104444
Navigating weight stigma: An integrative review of midwives' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about caring for larger-bodied women
Abstract
Problem: Women are vulnerable to weight bias during their reproductive years. However, little is known about midwives' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about caring for larger bodied women.
Background: Women have reported experiencing weight stigma during interactions with healthcare providers, including midwives. Weight stigma is associated with reduced quality of health and primary healthcare avoidance. In Australia over half of pregnant women are of a higher weight during their reproductive years.
Aim: To describe what is currently known about midwives' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs relating to caring for larger bodied women across the peripartum period.
Methods: An integrative review was undertaken, involving a systematic literature search, quality appraisal, and synthesis of findings within the socioecological framework.
Findings: Sixteen articles were included. Across the socioecological levels: individual level themes related to midwives' attitudes and beliefs and midwives' own body size; interpersonal themes related to communication and relationships; community themes related to the influence of cultural norms; organisation/institutional level themes related to BMI and weight checks, the need for training and education, and the role of healthcare practices and guidelines emerged; finally, at the policy level, system level factors and a weight inclusive approach were identified.
Discussion: This review highlighted that some midwives and student midwives hold negative, stigmatising views towards larger bodied women. Midwives are impacted by their own attitudes and beliefs as well as interpersonal, societal, organisational and system level factors.
Conclusion: Efforts to reduce weight stigma require a multi-level socio-ecological approach, including educational strategies aimed at shifting current and future midwives' stigmatising attitudes and beliefs towards larger bodied women.
Keywords: Attitudes and practice; Health knowledges; Maternal health services; Maternal obesity; Midwifery; Pregnancy; Weight prejudice.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Factors influencing midwives' intentions to facilitate normal physiological birth: A qualitative study.Women Birth. 2024 Jul;37(4):101617. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2024.101617. Epub 2024 May 2. Women Birth. 2024. PMID: 38701683
-
A qualitative study of factors that influence midwives' practice in relation to low-risk women's oral intake in labour in Australia.Women Birth. 2020 Sep;33(5):e455-e463. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Nov 30. Women Birth. 2020. PMID: 31796342
-
How do midwives learn about, understand, and integrate Cultural Safety into their care of First Nations women and families? A qualitative exploration.Women Birth. 2025 Jan;38(1):101868. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2025.101868. Epub 2025 Jan 10. Women Birth. 2025. PMID: 39798262
-
Midwives' perceptions and experiences of caring for women who experience perinatal mental health problems: An integrative review.Midwifery. 2017 Feb;45:56-71. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2016.12.010. Epub 2016 Dec 12. Midwifery. 2017. PMID: 28039845 Review.
-
Midwives' perspectives on (dis)respectful intrapartum care during facility-based delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: a qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.Reprod Health. 2019 Jul 25;16(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s12978-019-0773-y. Reprod Health. 2019. PMID: 31345239 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources