Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2025 May;133(5):e70027.
doi: 10.1111/apm.70027.

Microbiological Analysis of Lower Airway Samples: Does It Influence the Outcome in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia?

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Microbiological Analysis of Lower Airway Samples: Does It Influence the Outcome in Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia?

Peter Ellekvist et al. APMIS. 2025 May.

Abstract

This prospective randomized trial examined the impact of extensive lower respiratory tract sampling and microbial analysis on treatment decisions and patient outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). One hundred and eighteen patients were randomized to rigorous sampling (intervention group, n = 64) or standard care (control group, n = 54). The primary outcome was antibiotic therapy change based on microbiological results. Secondary outcomes included intravenous therapy duration, hospital stay length, 30-day mortality, and readmission rate. Unexpectedly, many control group patients underwent sampling at the physician's discretion, making the groups equivalent in sampling frequency. Microbiological analysis led to antibiotic therapy changes in 28% of intervention and 30% of control patients. Overall, 34% of sampled patients had treatment adjustments, generally leading to antibiotic broadening. No significant differences were observed between groups in secondary outcomes. While rigorous sampling did not significantly impact overall patient outcomes, microbiological analysis influenced treatment decisions in a substantial proportion of patients. Future studies should evaluate the effects of sampling for CAP diagnosis in settings where broader-spectrum antibiotics are the empirical treatment of choice to determine the impact on treatment decisions.

Keywords: antimicrobial treatment; community‐acquired pneumonia; lower‐airway sampling; microbiological findings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Eccles S., Pincus C., Higgins B., Woodhead M., and on behalf of the Guideline Development Group , “Diagnosis and Management of Community and Hospital Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: Summary of NICE Guidance,” British Medical Journal 349 (2014): g6722. - PubMed
    1. Søgaard M., Nielsen R. B., Schønheyder H. C., Nørgaard M., and Thomsen R. W., “Nationwide Trends in Pneumonia Hospitalization Rates and Mortality, Denmark 1997–2011,” Respiratory Medicine 108, no. 8 (2014): 1214–1222. - PubMed
    1. Markussen D. L., Serigstad S., Ritz C., et al., “Diagnostic Stewardship in Community‐Acquired Pneumonia With Syndromic Molecular Testing: A Randomized Clinical Trial,” JAMA Network Open 7, no. 3 (2024): e240830. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fally M., Bastrup Israelsen S., Benfield T., Tarp B., Kolte L., and Ravn P., “The Impact of Lower Respiratory Tract Sample Cultures on Outcomes in Community‐Acquired Pneumonia: A Propensity Score–Matched Cohort Study,” Clinical Infectious Diseases (2024) ciae611. - PubMed
    1. Dalby T., Hammerum A. M., Hansen F., and Petersen A., “Danmap 2020,” 2020.

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances