The Recovery of Ciprofol, Remimazolam and Remimazolam-Flumazenil for General Anesthesia Undergoing Fundus Surgery: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study
- PMID: 40351350
- PMCID: PMC12064274
- DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S512431
The Recovery of Ciprofol, Remimazolam and Remimazolam-Flumazenil for General Anesthesia Undergoing Fundus Surgery: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Study
Abstract
Purpose: Ciprofol (HSK3486 injectable emulsion) is a 2.6-disubstituted phenol derivative that acts similarly to propofol with a fast onset, quick, and stable recovery. Moreover, remimazolam is a new benzodiazepine with a faster onset and recovery than midazolam, and more stable hemodynamics than propofol. We found no relevant literature that directly compared these two drugs. The primary objective of this study was to compare the recovery of HSK3486 with that of remimazolam during successful general anesthesia.
Patients and methods: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study included 93 patients who had undergone fundus surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: HSK3486 (H group), remimazolam-saline (RS group), and remimazolam-flumazenil (RF group). The primary outcome was the time from drug withdrawal to eye opening, and the secondary outcome was the time from drug withdrawal to laryngeal mask removal, the time for Aldrete modified score ≥ 9, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, post-operative adverse events (nausea, vomiting, pain, delirium, re-sedation), and the Quality of Recovery-15 score before surgery and at 1, 7, and 14 days post-operatively.
Results: The RF group showed the shortest eye-opening time: 3.8 (2.8) min vs 13.3 (5.2) min for the H group, P < 0.001; and 11.5 (5.5) min for the RS group, P < 0.001. And laryngeal mask removal time was 5.2 (3.1) min for the RF group vs 14.1 (5.2) min for the H group, P < 0.001; and 12.4 (5.5) min for the RS group, P < 0.001. There were no significant differences in other post-operative outcomes.
Conclusion: The incorporation of flumazenil with remimazolam for total intravenous anesthesia provided rapid and reliable recovery of consciousness, although there were no significant visible differences between HSK3486 and Remimazolam-saline.
Keywords: HSK3486; fungus surgery; recovery; remimazolam; total intravenous anesthesia.
© 2025 Zhang et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Emergence profiles of remimazolam-flumazenil versus propofol in pediatric general anesthesia for strabismus correction: a randomized clinical trial.BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Apr 28;25(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03050-w. BMC Anesthesiol. 2025. PMID: 40295910 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Propofol Sedation on the Early Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024 May 23;18:1743-1754. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S456675. eCollection 2024. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2024. PMID: 38803562 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the recovery profile of remimazolam with flumazenil and propofol anesthesia for open thyroidectomy.BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 May 2;23(1):147. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02104-1. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023. PMID: 37131126 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hemodynamic Influences of Remimazolam Versus Propofol During the Induction Period of General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Pain Physician. 2023 Nov;26(7):E761-E773. Pain Physician. 2023. PMID: 37976477
-
Comparing subjective quality of recovery between remimazolam- and propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia for surgical procedures: a meta-analysis.Syst Rev. 2024 Sep 17;13(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02660-8. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39289773 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources