Comparative Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-guided Sacroiliac Joint Block versus Conservative Management in Sacroiliitis: A Prospective Cohort Study
- PMID: 40351610
- PMCID: PMC12064248
- DOI: 10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5636
Comparative Efficacy of Fluoroscopy-guided Sacroiliac Joint Block versus Conservative Management in Sacroiliitis: A Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Introduction: Dysfunction of the sacroiliac joint is a frequently overlooked etiology for lumbosacral and gluteal pain. This study compares the efficacy of fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint (SIJ) blocks versus conservative management in patients with sacroiliitis.
Materials and methods: A prospective cohort study was done involving 88 patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis. Group I (n = 48) received conservative management, while Group II (n = 40) underwent fluoroscopy-guided SIJ blocks. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaire at baseline and 6 months.
Results: Significant progress was observed in both groups, but Group II demonstrated superior outcomes. The mean VAS reduction was greater in Group II (5.3 points) compared to Group I (3.1 points). Similarly, functional improvement measured by ODI was higher in Group II (55%) than Group I (39.9%). The EQ-5D-5L index value increased more substantially in Group II (0.42-0.79) than in Group I (0.41-0.67), with statistically significant differences between groups (P = 4.51 × 10-8).
Conclusion: Fluoroscopy-guided SIJ blocks provide significantly better pain relief, functional improvement, and life quality enhancement as compared to conservative management in patients diagnosed with sacroiliitis. This intervention should be considered for patients with inadequate response to conservative treatment.
Keywords: Sacroiliitis; fluoroscopy; physiotherapy; sacroiliac joint block.
Copyright: © Indian Orthopaedic Research Group.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: Nil
Figures
Similar articles
-
Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided sacroiliac joint intra-articular injections in the noninflammatory sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb;95(2):330-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.09.021. Epub 2013 Oct 9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014. PMID: 24121083 Clinical Trial.
-
Two-Year Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial of Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion vs. Non-Surgical Management for Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction.Int J Spine Surg. 2016 Aug 23;10:28. doi: 10.14444/3028. eCollection 2016. Int J Spine Surg. 2016. PMID: 27652199 Free PMC article.
-
1-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Conservative Management vs. Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment for Sacroiliac Joint Pain.Pain Physician. 2017 Sep;20(6):537-550. Pain Physician. 2017. PMID: 28934785 Clinical Trial.
-
[Minimally invasive arthrodesis of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ)].Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022 Apr;34(2):98-108. doi: 10.1007/s00064-021-00738-3. Epub 2021 Oct 18. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2022. PMID: 34661704 Review. German.
-
Fusion and patient-reported outcomes after navigated decortication and direct arthrodesis in minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion using cylindrical threaded implants: a case series and literature review.Neurosurg Focus. 2023 Jul;55(1):E2. doi: 10.3171/2023.4.FOCUS23145. Neurosurg Focus. 2023. PMID: 37392775 Review.
References
-
- Daum WJ. The sacroiliac joint:An underappreciated pain generator. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 1995;24:475–8. - PubMed
-
- LeBlanc KE. Sacroiliac sprain:An overlooked cause of back pain. Am Fam Physician. 1992;46:1459–63. - PubMed
-
- Verrills P, Vivian D. Interventions in chronic low back pain. Aust Fam Physician. 2004;33:421–6. - PubMed
-
- Rosenberg JM, Quint TJ, De Rosayro AM. Computerized tomographic localization of clinically-guided sacroiliac joint injections. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:18–21. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources