Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Apr 21;26(4):26943.
doi: 10.31083/RCM26943. eCollection 2025 Apr.

Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Death Following Extended Aortic Arch Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Affiliations

Development and Validation of a Novel Nomogram Risk Prediction Model for In-Hospital Death Following Extended Aortic Arch Repair for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

Qiyi Chen et al. Rev Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Extended aortic arch repair (EAR) is increasingly adopted for treating acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). However, existing prediction models may not be suitable for assessing the in-hospital death risk in ATAAD patients undergoing EAR. This study aims to develop a comprehensive risk prediction model for in-hospital death following EAR based on patient's preoperative status and surgical data, which may contribute to identification of high-risk individuals and improve outcomes following EAR.

Methods: We reviewed clinical records of consecutive adult ATAAD patients undergoing EAR at our institute between January 2015 and December 2022. Utilizing data from 925 ATAAD patients undergoing EAR, we employed multivariable logistic regression and machine learning techniques, respectively, to develop nomograms for in-hospital mortality. Employed machine learning techniques included simple decision tree, random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machine (SVM).

Results: The nomogram based on SVM outperformed others, achieving a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.842 on training dataset and a mean AUC of 0.782 on testing dataset, accompanied by a Brier score of 0.058. Key risk factors included cerebral malperfusion, mesenteric malperfusion, preoperative critical station, Marfan syndrome, platelet count, D-dimer, coronary artery bypass grafting, and cardiopulmonary bypass time. A web-based application was developed for clinical use.

Conclusions: We develop a novel nomogram risk prediction model based on SVM algorithm for in-hospital death following extended aortic arch repair for ATAAD with good discrimination and accuracy.

Clinical trial registration: Registration number ChiCTR2200066414, https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=187074.

Keywords: acute type A aortic dissection; extended aortic arch repair; machine learning; nomogram; prediction model.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Flow chart for the selection of study population and study design. ATAAD, acute type A aortic dissection; FET, frozen elephant trunk; LR, logistic regression analysis; RF, random forest; Dtree, decision tree; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; SVM, support vector machine; SHAP, SHapley Additive exPlanations; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; DCA, decision curve analysis.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
The ROC curves of models. (A) The ROC curves of Fit.LR model; (B) the ROC curves of Fit.RF model; (C) the ROC curves of Fit.Dtree model; (D) the ROC curves of Fit.XGBoost model; (E) the ROC curves of Fit.SVM model. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; LR, logistic regression analysis; RF, random forest; Dtree, decision tree; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; SVM, support vector machine; AUC, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
The calibration curves of models. (A) The calibration curves of Fit.LR model; (B) the calibration curves of Fit.RF model; (C) the calibration curves of Fit.Dtree model; (D) the calibration curves of Fit.XGBoost model; (E) the calibration curves of Fit.SVM model. ROC, receiver operating characteristic; R2, coefficient of complex determination; D, discrimination index; U, unreliability index; Q, quality index; LR, logistic regression analysis; RF, random forest; Dtree, decision tree; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; SVM, support vector machine; Dxy, the magnitude of the rank correlation between the predicted probability and the observed value; Emax, the maximum absolute difference between the predicted value and the actual value; E90, the 90th percentile of the difference between the predicted value and the true value; Eavg, the average difference between the predicted value and the actual value; S:z, Z-value of Spiegelhalter Z-test; S:p, p-value of Spiegelhalter Z-test.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
The DCA curves of models. LR, logistic regression analysis; RF, random forest; Dtree, decision tree; XGBoost, eXtreme Gradient Boosting; SVM, support vector machine; DCA, decision curve analysis.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
The nomogram of Fit.SVM. IscCerebral, cerebral malperfusion; D2, D-dimer; Plt, platelet count; CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; IscMesenteric, mesenteric malperfusion; CPStatus, critical preoperative status; Transfusion, intraoperative blood product transfusion; CPBT, cardiopulmonary bypass time; SVM, support vector machine.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Evangelista A, Isselbacher EM, Bossone E, Gleason TG, Eusanio MD, Sechtem U, et al. Insights From the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection: A 20-Year Experience of Collaborative Clinical Research. Circulation . 2018;137:1846–1860. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.031264. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trimarchi S, Nienaber CA, Rampoldi V, Myrmel T, Suzuki T, Mehta RH, et al. Contemporary results of surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection experience. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery . 2005;129:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2004.09.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen SW, Chen Y, Ma WG, Zhong YL, Qiao ZY, Ge YP, et al. Limited vs. extended repair for acute type I aortic dissection: long-term outcomes over a decade in Beijing Anzhen Hospital. Chinese Medical Journal . 2021;134:986–988. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001416. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xue Y, Pan J, Cao H, Fan F, Luo X, Ge M, et al. Different aortic arch surgery methods for type A aortic dissection: clinical outcomes and follow-up results. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery . 2020;31:254–262. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa095. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sun L, Qi R, Zhu J, Liu Y, Zheng J. Total arch replacement combined with stented elephant trunk implantation: a new “standard” therapy for type a dissection involving repair of the aortic arch? Circulation . 2011;123:971–978. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015081. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources