Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 8:12:23743735251341724.
doi: 10.1177/23743735251341724. eCollection 2025.

Towards a Novel Patient Experience Survey System: Incorporating Physician Perspectives into Performance Feedback Dashboard Design

Affiliations

Towards a Novel Patient Experience Survey System: Incorporating Physician Perspectives into Performance Feedback Dashboard Design

Stacie Vilendrer et al. J Patient Exp. .

Abstract

We aim to incorporate physician insights into the development of a performance dashboard based on a novel patient experience survey system at a large academic health system. A multidisciplinary team of physicians, researchers, and designers met regularly to develop the dashboard informed by Clinical Performance Feedback Intervention Theory. Semistructured qualitative interviews with frontline physicians underwent combined inductive-deductive thematic analysis to inform dashboard improvements. A total of 20 interviews were conducted April-July 2023 with 9 neurologists and 6 primary care physicians in 2 phases. Physician preferences converged along design, content, and administration features, which were incorporated into the dashboard and accepted by physicians during phase 2. Important themes included establishment of survey credibility, preference for qualitative over quantitative data, and associated incentive structure. Dashboard design required an intuitive data overview with features such as hover-over insights that allowed deeper exploration. Physicians valued patient comments over quantitative data, prompting further redesign of the dashboard to prioritize qualitative insights, contrasting with the national emphasis on quantitative benchmarks.

Keywords: coaching; patient experience; performance feedback; physician wellbeing; quality improvement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient satisfaction performance feedback dashboard phase 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Patient satisfaction performance feedback dashboard phase 2.

Similar articles

References

    1. Richard Bolton Siegrist J. Patient satisfaction: history, myths, and misperceptions. AMA J Ethics. 2013;15(11):982-987. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2013.15.11.mhst1-1311 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Why Improve Patient Experience? Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2020. Accessed October 10, 2023. https://www.ahrq.gov/cahps/quality-improvement/improvement-guide/2-why-i...
    1. Glickman SW, Boulding W, Manary M, et al. Patient satisfaction and its relationship with clinical quality and inpatient mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010;3(2):188-195. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.900597 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, Glickman SW. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(3):201-203. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1211775 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darnall BD, Schatman ME. Autonomy vs paternalism in the emergency department: the potential deleterious impact of patient satisfaction surveys. Pain Med. 2013;14(7):968. doi:10.1111/pme.12170 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources