Did Serendipity Contribute to the Discovery of New Antidepressant Drugs? Historical Analysis Using Operational Criteria
- PMID: 40352067
- PMCID: PMC12059740
- DOI: 10.31083/AP40037
Did Serendipity Contribute to the Discovery of New Antidepressant Drugs? Historical Analysis Using Operational Criteria
Abstract
Objective: Given their great importance, as one of the most prescribed types of therapeutic drugs worldwide, we have analyzed the role of serendipity in the discovery of new antidepressants, ranging from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors to more contemporary developments.
Methods: We carried out a historical analysis of the discovery of new antidepressants, resorting to the original articles published on their development (initial pharmacological and clinical information) and applied an operational criterion of serendipity developed by our group.
Results: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, citalopram, paroxetine, sertraline, and escitalopram), selective dopamine and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (bupropion), noradrenaline and serotonin reuptake inhibitors (venlafaxine, milnacipram, duloxetine, and desvenlafaxine), selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (reboxetine), noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (mirtazapine), melatonergic agonists (agomelatine), and serotonin modulators and stimulators (vortioxetine, vilazodone, tianeptine) correspond to the type IV pattern. Moclobemide, a reversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor, corresponds to the type II pattern, for which the initial serendipitous findings (i.e., the chance discovery of the inhibitory effects of monoamine oxidase (MAO) whilst being studied for their antihyperlipidemic properties) led to subsequent non-serendipitous discoveries (clinical antidepressant efficacy). Ketamine, a glutamatergic modulator, corresponds to the type III pattern, characterized by a non-serendipitous origin (initial development as an anesthetic agent) leading to a serendipitous observation (the discovery of antidepressant efficacy in individuals illicitly using).
Conclusion: The majority of new antidepressants adhere to a type IV pattern, characterized by a rational and targeted design process where serendipity played no part, except moclobemide (type II pattern) and ketamine (type III pattern).
Keywords: antidepressants; history of medicine; psychopharmacology; serendipity.
Copyright: © 2025 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. Domenico De Berardis is serving as one of the Editorial Board members of this journal. We declare that Domenico De Berardis had no involvement in the peer review of this article and has no access to information regarding its peer review. Full responsibility for the editorial process for this article was delegated to Dong-Bin Cai.
Figures
References
-
- López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Domino E. History of Psychopharmacology, 4 Volumes. 1ª Edition . NPP Books; Arlington, TX, USA: 2014.
-
- López-Muñoz F, Álamo C. Neurobiology of Depression . CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; Boca Raton: 2012.
-
- Fangmann P, Assion HJ, Juckel G, González CA, López-Muñoz F. Half a century of antidepressant drugs: on the clinical introduction of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, and tetracyclics. Part II: tricyclics and tetracyclics. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology . 2008;28:1–4. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181627b60. - DOI - PubMed
-
- López-Muñoz F, Álamo C, Juckel G, Assion HJ. Half a century of antidepressant drugs: on the clinical introduction of monoamine oxidase inhibitors, tricyclics, and tetracyclics. Part I: monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology . 2007;27:555–559. doi: 10.1097/jcp.0b013e3181bb617. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources