Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 May 9;24(1):117.
doi: 10.1007/s40200-025-01624-6. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Implementing a localized health promotion model in diabetic patients: a field trial

Affiliations

Implementing a localized health promotion model in diabetic patients: a field trial

Termeh Tarjoman et al. J Diabetes Metab Disord. .

Abstract

Objectives: Diabetes mellitus, a major cardiovascular risk factor, is a leading non-communicable disease globally. Self-management education can effectively prevent and control diabetes. We evaluated a localized health promotion model for diabetic patients through a field trial in a general hospital.

Methods: We enrolled 452 diabetic patients who visited our hospital's cardiology and internal medicine wards and randomly assigned them to two equal groups: intervention and control. The intervention group received initial and periodic education on diabetes management and lifestyle modification, as well as educational materials. The control group received only initial education and phone follow-ups. We measured the following outcomes after 6 and 12 months of discharge: glucose and lipid levels, smoking status, diet quality, rehospitalization rate, treatment cost, quality of life, and work absenteeism. The groups were then compared using chi-square, student t-test, and two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results: We enrolled 452 patients, randomized into two equal groups, and followed them for one year. Baseline demographic and clinical variables were similar between groups. The intervention group showed a significant reduction in BMI (P = 0.027), fasting blood glucose (P < 0.001), and HbA1c levels (P = 0.002) compared to the control group. The prevalence of hypertension, smoking, sedentary lifestyle, and inappropriate diet was significantly higher in the control group (P = 0.001 for all). The intervention group had fewer hospitalizations, work absences, and medical costs (P < 0.001, P = 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). No significant difference was observed in satisfaction rates between the groups.

Conclusions: Health promotion interventions could improve glucose control and other health indicators and reduce costs for diabetic patients.

Keywords: Diabetes mellitus; Field trial; Health education; Health promotion; Healthy lifestyle.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsNone declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Groene O, Garcia-Barbero M. Health promotion in hospitals: evidence and quality management. Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe Copenhagen; 2005.
    1. Pelikan JM, Dietscher C, Schmied H. Health promotion for NCDs in and by hospitals: A health promoting hospital perspective. Global Handbook on Noncommunicable Diseases and Health Promotion2013. pp. 441– 60.
    1. Hamidi Y, Hazavehei SMM, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Seif Rabiei MA, Farhadian M, Alimohamadi S, et al. Health promoting hospitals in Iran: A review of the current status, challenges, and future prospects. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019;33:47DOI. 10.34171/mjiri.33.47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miseviciene I, Zalnieraitiene K. Health promoting hospitals in Lithuania: health professional support for standards. Health Promot Int. 2013;28(4):512–21. 10.1093/heapro/das035. - PubMed
    1. Svane JK, Egerod I, Tønnesen H. Staff experiences with strategic implementation of clinical health promotion: A nested qualitative study in the WHO-HPH recognition process RCT. SAGE Open Med. 2018;6:2050312118792394DOI. 10.1177/2050312118792394. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources